These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1951197)
21. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups. Cha KS Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Posttreatment changes in different facial types. Zaher AR; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):425-36. PubMed ID: 7864464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance. Altug Z; Arslan AD Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions. Waters D; Harris EF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients. LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height. Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The mechanism of Class II correction in surgical orthodontic treatment of adult Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Pancherz H; Ruf S; Erbe C; Hansen K Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):800-9. PubMed ID: 15673144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dental and skeletal contributions to occlusal correction in patients treated with the high-pull headgear-activator combination. Lagerström LO; Nielsen IL; Lee R; Isaacson RJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jun; 97(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 2353679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1--Skeletal changes. Derringer K Br J Orthod; 1990 Feb; 17(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2310738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An evidence-based approach to treatment of open bite and deep bite: case reports. Hans MG; Teng CM; Liao CC; Chen YH; Yang CY World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 17373225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial. Bondemark L; Karlsson I Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The effect of cervical headgear and lower utility arch on the control of vertical dimension in tooth and jaw]. Zhang L; Luo Y; Wang RF Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Aug; 19(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 20871954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype. Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cephalometric analysis of molar and anterior tooth movement during cervical headgear treatment in relation to growth patterns. Godt A; Berneburg M; Kalwitzki M; Göz G J Orofac Orthop; 2008 May; 69(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 18506404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Marşan G Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Vertical changes in high mandibular plane cases following enucleation of second premolars. Garlington M; Logan LR Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(4):263-7; discussion 267-8. PubMed ID: 2256563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report. Giancotti A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extraction of 4 premolars. Kim TW; Artun J; Behbehani F; Artese F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 12594419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases. Ramesh GC; Pradeep MC; Kumar GA; Girish KS; Suresh BS J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 23404008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Longitudinal evaluation of condylar position in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Gianelly AA; Anderson CK; Boffa J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 1951194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]