These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19513117)

  • 1. The roles of entropy and kinetics in structure prediction.
    Bowman GR; Pande VS
    PLoS One; 2009 Jun; 4(6):e5840. PubMed ID: 19513117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulated tempering yields insight into the low-resolution Rosetta scoring functions.
    Bowman GR; Pande VS
    Proteins; 2009 Feb; 74(3):777-88. PubMed ID: 18767152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A coarse-grained protein force field for folding and structure prediction.
    Maupetit J; Tuffery P; Derreumaux P
    Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(2):394-408. PubMed ID: 17600832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold-recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models.
    Koliński A; Bujnicki JM
    Proteins; 2005; 61 Suppl 7():84-90. PubMed ID: 16187348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folding processes of the B domain of protein A to the native state observed in all-atom ab initio folding simulations.
    Lei H; Wu C; Wang ZX; Zhou Y; Duan Y
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Jun; 128(23):235105. PubMed ID: 18570534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced Fragment Diversity for Alpha and Alpha-Beta Protein Structure Prediction using Rosetta.
    Abbass J; Nebel JC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2017; 24(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 27993124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A free-energy approach for all-atom protein simulation.
    Verma A; Wenzel W
    Biophys J; 2009 May; 96(9):3483-94. PubMed ID: 19413955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Massive integration of diverse protein quality assessment methods to improve template based modeling in CASP11.
    Cao R; Bhattacharya D; Adhikari B; Li J; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):247-59. PubMed ID: 26369671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators.
    Fogolari F; Tosatto SC; Colombo G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():301. PubMed ID: 16354298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A correlation-based method for the enhancement of scoring functions on funnel-shaped energy landscapes.
    Stumpff-Kane AW; Feig M
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):155-64. PubMed ID: 16397892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative criteria for native energetic heterogeneity influences in the prediction of protein folding kinetics.
    Cho SS; Levy Y; Wolynes PG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jan; 106(2):434-9. PubMed ID: 19075236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of protein folding rate from Monte Carlo simulations and entropy capacity.
    Galzitskaya OV
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2010 Nov; 11(7):523-37. PubMed ID: 20887263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structure prediction for CASP7 targets using extensive all-atom refinement with Rosetta@home.
    Das R; Qian B; Raman S; Vernon R; Thompson J; Bradley P; Khare S; Tyka MD; Bhat D; Chivian D; Kim DE; Sheffler WH; Malmström L; Wollacott AM; Wang C; Andre I; Baker D
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():118-28. PubMed ID: 17894356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of nonnative interactions on protein folding rates: theory and simulation.
    Clementi C; Plotkin SS
    Protein Sci; 2004 Jul; 13(7):1750-66. PubMed ID: 15215519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An all-atom structure-based potential for proteins: bridging minimal models with all-atom empirical forcefields.
    Whitford PC; Noel JK; Gosavi S; Schug A; Sanbonmatsu KY; Onuchic JN
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(2):430-41. PubMed ID: 18837035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Entropy capacity determines protein folding.
    Galzitskaya OV; Garbuzynskiy SO
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 16400647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MUFOLD: A new solution for protein 3D structure prediction.
    Zhang J; Wang Q; Barz B; He Z; Kosztin I; Shang Y; Xu D
    Proteins; 2010 Apr; 78(5):1137-52. PubMed ID: 19927325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nature of the free energy barriers to two-state folding.
    Akmal A; Muñoz V
    Proteins; 2004 Oct; 57(1):142-52. PubMed ID: 15326600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.
    Bonneau R; Ruczinski I; Tsai J; Baker D
    Protein Sci; 2002 Aug; 11(8):1937-44. PubMed ID: 12142448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A metastable state in folding simulations of a protein model.
    Dinner AR; Karplus M
    Nat Struct Biol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 9501918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.