These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19513737)

  • 21. The cement mantle of femoral hip implants is more influenced by stem-broach sizing than by shape: an in vitro CT analysis of straight Charnley-Kerboul and anatomic Lubinus SPII stems.
    Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1473-81. PubMed ID: 19198861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Femoral cement grading in total hip arthroplasty.
    Harvey EJ; Tanzer M; Bobyn JD
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 9645519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cement technique changes improved hip resurfacing longevity - implant retrieval findings.
    Campbell P; Takamura K; Lundergan W; Esposito C; Amstutz HC
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19583544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips.
    Kawate K; Maloney WJ; Bragdon CR; Biggs SA; Jasty M; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):70-6. PubMed ID: 9917592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Four-angle radiographic assessment of cement mantle thickness in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Kawate K; Yajima H; Tomita Y; Sugimoto K; Ohmura T; Hiyoshi N; Takakura Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Oct; 18(7):914-9. PubMed ID: 14566749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre.
    Hook S; Moulder E; Yates PJ; Burston BJ; Whitley E; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1584-90. PubMed ID: 17159168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cement-within-cement stem exchange using the collarless polished double-taper stem.
    Mandziak DG; Howie DW; Neale SD; McGee MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):1000-6. PubMed ID: 17920472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bilateral femoral component breakage in total hip replacement: a case report.
    Murray P; Rorabeck H
    Can J Surg; 1998 Jun; 41(3):236-8. PubMed ID: 9627550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Polished vs rough femoral components in grade A and grade C-2 cement mantles.
    Duffy GP; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 17027551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison between triple-tapered and double-tapered cemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study comparing the C-Stem versus the Exeter Universal early results after 5 years of clinical experience.
    Ek ET; Choong PF
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 15660066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pressurization and centralization enhance the quality and reproducibility of cement mantles.
    Noble PC; Collier MB; Maltry JA; Kamaric E; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):77-89. PubMed ID: 9917593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results.
    Ebramzadeh E; Sarmiento A; McKellop HA; Llinas A; Gogan W
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1994 Jan; 76(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 8288668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impaction allografting of the proximal femur using a Charnley-type stem: a cement mantle analysis.
    Masterson EL; Busch CA; Duncan CP; Drabu K
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Jan; 14(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9926954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of Charnley femoral stem aseptic loosening by early post-operative radiological features.
    Malik MH; Fisher N; Gray J; Wroblewski BM; Kay PR
    Int Orthop; 2005 Oct; 29(5):268-71. PubMed ID: 16082542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Femoral periprosthetic bone remodelling to the proximal femur after implantation of custom made anatomic and standard straight stem hip prostheses].
    Arabmotlagh M; Hennigs T; Rittmeister M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):519-25. PubMed ID: 14551837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.