65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19514804)
1. Interactive voice response systems for improving delivery of ambulatory care.
Oake N; Jennings A; van Walraven C; Forster AJ
Am J Manag Care; 2009 Jun; 15(6):383-91. PubMed ID: 19514804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using an interactive voice response system to improve patient safety following hospital discharge.
Forster AJ; van Walraven C
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 17518797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lessons and pitfalls of interactive voice response in medical research.
Abu-Hasaballah K; James A; Aseltine RH
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Sep; 28(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 17400520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated patient assessments after outpatient surgery using an interactive voice response system.
Forster AJ; LaBranche R; McKim R; Faught JW; Feasby TE; Janes-Kelley S; Shojania KG; van Walraven C
Am J Manag Care; 2008 Jul; 14(7):429-36. PubMed ID: 18611094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease.
Piette JD
Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):817-27. PubMed ID: 11067378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detailed review and analysis of complex radiotherapy clinical trial planning data: evaluation and initial experience with the SWAN software system.
Ebert MA; Haworth A; Kearvell R; Hooton B; Coleman R; Spry N; Bydder S; Joseph D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 18077034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system.
Haas JS; Iyer A; Orav EJ; Schiff GD; Bates DW
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Sep; 19(9):961-9. PubMed ID: 20623512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structured review: evaluating the effectiveness of nurse case managers in improving health outcomes in three major chronic diseases.
Sutherland D; Hayter M
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Nov; 18(21):2978-92. PubMed ID: 19747197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of patient-reported outcome data captured using paper and interactive voice response diaries in an allergic rhinitis study: is electronic data capture really better?
Weiler K; Christ AM; Woodworth GG; Weiler RL; Weiler JM
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2004 Mar; 92(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 15049397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal.
Haynes RB; Walker CJ
Arch Intern Med; 1987 Jul; 147(7):1297-301. PubMed ID: 3606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Telephone follow-up in primary care: can interactive voice response calls work?
Houser SH; Ray MN; Maisiak R; Panjamapirom A; Willing J; Schiff GD; English T; Nevin C; Berner ES
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():112-6. PubMed ID: 23920526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying patients with post-discharge care problems using an interactive voice response system.
Forster AJ; Boyle L; Shojania KG; Feasby TE; van Walraven C
J Gen Intern Med; 2009 Apr; 24(4):520-5. PubMed ID: 19156467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings.
Willig JH; Krawitz M; Panjamapirom A; Ray MN; Nevin CR; English TM; Cohen MP; Berner ES
J Med Syst; 2013 Apr; 37(2):9905. PubMed ID: 23340825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech recognition in dental software systems: features and functionality.
Yuhaniak Irwin J; Fernando S; Schleyer T; Spallek H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1127-31. PubMed ID: 17911891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploration of an automated approach for receiving patient feedback after outpatient acute care visits.
Berner ES; Ray MN; Panjamapirom A; Maisiak RS; Willig JH; English TM; Krawitz M; Nevin CR; Houser S; Cohen MP; Schiff GD
J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24610308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Press 1 to promote health behavior with interactive voice response.
Trachtenbarg DE
Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jun; 12(6):305. PubMed ID: 16756448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial to determine the impact on compliance of a psychophysical peripheral cue based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model.
Horton RJ; Minniti A; Mireylees S; McEntegart D
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Nov; 29(6):823-8. PubMed ID: 18805509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of automatic speech recognition to quantitative assessment of tracheoesophageal speech with different signal quality.
Haderlein T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Toy H; Schuster M; Eysholdt U; Hornegger J; Rosanowski F
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19122460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Addressing the Symptom Management Gap in Patients With Cancer and Heart Failure Using the Interactive Voice Response System: A Pilot Study.
Fadol AP; Mendoza TR; Lenihan DJ; Berry DL
J Adv Pract Oncol; 2018 Mar; 9(2):201-214. PubMed ID: 30588354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]