BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19514804)

  • 1. Interactive voice response systems for improving delivery of ambulatory care.
    Oake N; Jennings A; van Walraven C; Forster AJ
    Am J Manag Care; 2009 Jun; 15(6):383-91. PubMed ID: 19514804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using an interactive voice response system to improve patient safety following hospital discharge.
    Forster AJ; van Walraven C
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 17518797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lessons and pitfalls of interactive voice response in medical research.
    Abu-Hasaballah K; James A; Aseltine RH
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Sep; 28(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 17400520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated patient assessments after outpatient surgery using an interactive voice response system.
    Forster AJ; LaBranche R; McKim R; Faught JW; Feasby TE; Janes-Kelley S; Shojania KG; van Walraven C
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Jul; 14(7):429-36. PubMed ID: 18611094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease.
    Piette JD
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):817-27. PubMed ID: 11067378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detailed review and analysis of complex radiotherapy clinical trial planning data: evaluation and initial experience with the SWAN software system.
    Ebert MA; Haworth A; Kearvell R; Hooton B; Coleman R; Spry N; Bydder S; Joseph D
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 18077034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system.
    Haas JS; Iyer A; Orav EJ; Schiff GD; Bates DW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Sep; 19(9):961-9. PubMed ID: 20623512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structured review: evaluating the effectiveness of nurse case managers in improving health outcomes in three major chronic diseases.
    Sutherland D; Hayter M
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Nov; 18(21):2978-92. PubMed ID: 19747197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of patient-reported outcome data captured using paper and interactive voice response diaries in an allergic rhinitis study: is electronic data capture really better?
    Weiler K; Christ AM; Woodworth GG; Weiler RL; Weiler JM
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2004 Mar; 92(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 15049397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal.
    Haynes RB; Walker CJ
    Arch Intern Med; 1987 Jul; 147(7):1297-301. PubMed ID: 3606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Telephone follow-up in primary care: can interactive voice response calls work?
    Houser SH; Ray MN; Maisiak R; Panjamapirom A; Willing J; Schiff GD; English T; Nevin C; Berner ES
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():112-6. PubMed ID: 23920526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying patients with post-discharge care problems using an interactive voice response system.
    Forster AJ; Boyle L; Shojania KG; Feasby TE; van Walraven C
    J Gen Intern Med; 2009 Apr; 24(4):520-5. PubMed ID: 19156467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings.
    Willig JH; Krawitz M; Panjamapirom A; Ray MN; Nevin CR; English TM; Cohen MP; Berner ES
    J Med Syst; 2013 Apr; 37(2):9905. PubMed ID: 23340825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in dental software systems: features and functionality.
    Yuhaniak Irwin J; Fernando S; Schleyer T; Spallek H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1127-31. PubMed ID: 17911891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploration of an automated approach for receiving patient feedback after outpatient acute care visits.
    Berner ES; Ray MN; Panjamapirom A; Maisiak RS; Willig JH; English TM; Krawitz M; Nevin CR; Houser S; Cohen MP; Schiff GD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24610308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Press 1 to promote health behavior with interactive voice response.
    Trachtenbarg DE
    Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jun; 12(6):305. PubMed ID: 16756448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized trial to determine the impact on compliance of a psychophysical peripheral cue based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model.
    Horton RJ; Minniti A; Mireylees S; McEntegart D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Nov; 29(6):823-8. PubMed ID: 18805509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of automatic speech recognition to quantitative assessment of tracheoesophageal speech with different signal quality.
    Haderlein T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Toy H; Schuster M; Eysholdt U; Hornegger J; Rosanowski F
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19122460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addressing the Symptom Management Gap in Patients With Cancer and Heart Failure Using the Interactive Voice Response System: A Pilot Study.
    Fadol AP; Mendoza TR; Lenihan DJ; Berry DL
    J Adv Pract Oncol; 2018 Mar; 9(2):201-214. PubMed ID: 30588354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.