502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19515032)
1. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
Emami E; Heydecke G; Rompré PH; de Grandmont P; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):533-44. PubMed ID: 19515032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of mandibular implant-retained overdentures improve patient satisfaction and quality of life.
Thomason JM
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 20230974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of mandibular implant-retained overdentures improve patient satisfaction and quality of life.
Thomason JM
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):182-4. PubMed ID: 23253842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adults Results from a randomized trial 2 months after treatment.
Heydecke G; Thomason JM; Lund JP; Feine JS
J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):649-57. PubMed ID: 16139696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-stabilized complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 2).
Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19260422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures.
Brennan M; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; O'Connell B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 20657876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life.
Assunção WG; Zardo GG; Delben JA; Barão VA
Gerodontology; 2007 Dec; 24(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 17999736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective study on immediate loading of implants with mandibular overdentures: patient-mediated and economic outcomes.
Attard NJ; Laporte A; Locker D; Zarb GA
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 16479763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the efficacy of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses in a group of Turkish patients: a quality of life study.
Cakir O; Kazancioglu HO; Celik G; Deger S; Ak G
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 24417762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of mandibular two-implant retained overdentures on life quality in a group of elderly Turkish edentulous patients.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T
Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2011; 53(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 21183231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effectiveness of 2-implant overdentures - a pragmatic international multicentre study.
Rashid F; Awad MA; Thomason JM; Piovano A; Spielberg GP; Scilingo E; Mojon P; Müller F; Spielberg M; Heydecke G; Stoker G; Wismeijer D; Allen F; Feine JS
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 20704639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and bite force between elderly edentulous patients wearing mandibular two implant-supported overdentures and conventional complete dentures after 4 years.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Mumcu E; Dayan C; Yabul A; Tuncer N
Spec Care Dentist; 2012; 32(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 22784321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant overdentures for edentulous elders: study of patient preference.
Esfandiari S; Lund JP; Penrod JR; Savard A; Thomason JM; Feine JS
Gerodontology; 2009 Mar; 26(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 18498362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
