BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19515189)

  • 1. Trends in the management of esophageal carcinoma based on provider volume: treatment practices of 618 esophageal surgeons.
    Enestvedt CK; Perry KA; Kim C; McConnell PW; Diggs BS; Vernon A; O'Rourke RW; Luketich JD; Hunter JG; Jobe BA
    Dis Esophagus; 2010 Feb; 23(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 19515189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
    Haverkamp L; Seesing MF; Ruurda JP; Boone J; V Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27001442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International survey on esophageal cancer: part I surgical techniques.
    Boone J; Livestro DP; Elias SG; Borel Rinkes IH; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 19191856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International survey on esophageal cancer: part II staging and neoadjuvant therapy.
    Boone J; Livestro DP; Elias SG; Borel Rinkes IH; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 19191855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Change in surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in the course of the past 50 years].
    Faller J
    Magy Seb; 2009 Feb; 62(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 19218161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Is Rectal Cancer Managed: a Survey Exploring Current Practice Patterns in Canada.
    Crawford A; Firtell J; Caycedo-Marulanda A
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2019 Jun; 50(2):260-268. PubMed ID: 29388060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Esophageal Cancer Surgeon Volume on Management and Mortality From Emergency Upper Gastrointestinal Conditions: Population-based Cohort Study.
    Markar SR; Mackenzie H; Askari A; Faiz O; Hanna GB
    Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):847-853. PubMed ID: 28704230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis.
    Cerfolio RJ; Bryant AS; Hawn MT
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 145(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 22910197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Application of artificial pneumothorax in semi-prone position to the video-assisted thoracic surgery of esophageal carcinoma].
    Peng L; Han YT; Wang X; Xiao WG; Chen LH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 34(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 23291075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence and outcome of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in a UK regional cancer network.
    Escofet X; Manjunath A; Twine C; Havard TJ; Clark GW; Lewis WG
    Dis Esophagus; 2010 Feb; 23(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 19549208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esophageal cancer surgery in 2005.
    Wright CD
    Minerva Chir; 2005 Dec; 60(6):431-44. PubMed ID: 16401998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
    Zahoor H; Luketich JD; Levy RM; Awais O; Winger DG; Gibson MK; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Feb; 149(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25454907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A single surgeon's series of transthoracic oesophageal resections.
    Beasley WD; Jefferies MT; Gilmour J; Manson JM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2014 Mar; 96(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 24780676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England.
    Lazzarino AI; Nagpal K; Bottle A; Faiz O; Moorthy K; Aylin P
    Ann Surg; 2010 Aug; 252(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 20622666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
    Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
    Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Worldwide practice in gastric cancer surgery.
    Brenkman HJ; Haverkamp L; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(15):4041-8. PubMed ID: 27099448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgeon and breast unit volume-outcome relationships in breast cancer surgery and treatment.
    McDermott AM; Wall DM; Waters PS; Cheung S; Sibbering M; Horgan K; Kearins O; Lawrence G; Patnick J; Kerin MJ;
    Ann Surg; 2013 Nov; 258(5):808-13; discussion 813-4. PubMed ID: 23989053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.
    Hardacker TJ; Ceppa D; Okereke I; Rieger KM; Jalal SI; LeBlanc JK; DeWitt JM; Kesler KA; Birdas TJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Nov; 21(12):3739-43. PubMed ID: 25047477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lymph node dissection in surgical treatment of esophageal neoplasms.
    Law S; Wong J
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2007 Jan; 16(1):115-31. PubMed ID: 17336240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.