These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19519325)

  • 21. PXR ligand classification model with SFED-weighted WHIM and CoMMA descriptors.
    Ma SL; Joung JY; Lee S; Cho KH; No KT
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2012 Jul; 23(5-6):485-504. PubMed ID: 22591167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative analysis of machine learning methods in ligand-based virtual screening of large compound libraries.
    Ma XH; Jia J; Zhu F; Xue Y; Li ZR; Chen YZ
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2009 May; 12(4):344-57. PubMed ID: 19442064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In silico machine learning methods in drug development.
    Dobchev DA; Pillai GG; Karelson M
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2014; 14(16):1913-22. PubMed ID: 25262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 18. Reliable Prediction of Chemical-Induced Urinary Tract Toxicity by Boosting Machine Learning Approaches.
    Lei T; Sun H; Kang Y; Zhu F; Liu H; Zhou W; Wang Z; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
    Mol Pharm; 2017 Nov; 14(11):3935-3953. PubMed ID: 29037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Weka machine learning for predicting the phospholipidosis inducing potential.
    Ivanciuc O
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2008; 8(18):1691-709. PubMed ID: 19075775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Virtual Screening Meets Deep Learning.
    Pérez-Sianes J; Pérez-Sánchez H; Díaz F
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2019; 15(1):6-28. PubMed ID: 30338743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. From machine learning to deep learning: progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery.
    Zhang L; Tan J; Han D; Zhu H
    Drug Discov Today; 2017 Nov; 22(11):1680-1685. PubMed ID: 28881183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accurate solubility prediction with error bars for electrolytes: a machine learning approach.
    Schwaighofer A; Schroeter T; Mika S; Laub J; ter Laak A; Sülzle D; Ganzer U; Heinrich N; Müller KR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 17243756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Machine Learning Methods in Computational Toxicology.
    Baskin II
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():119-139. PubMed ID: 29934890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Applications of machine learning in clinical decision support in the omic era].
    Zhao XT; Yang YD; Qu HZ; Fang XD
    Yi Chuan; 2018 Sep; 40(9):693-703. PubMed ID: 30369474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing the Influence of Simulated Experimental Errors on 12 Machine Learning Algorithms in Bioactivity Modeling Using 12 Diverse Data Sets.
    Cortes-Ciriano I; Bender A; Malliavin TE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1413-25. PubMed ID: 26038978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnosis of urinary tract infection based on artificial intelligence methods.
    Ozkan IA; Koklu M; Sert IU
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Nov; 166():51-59. PubMed ID: 30415718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simplifying mixture models using the unscented transform.
    Goldberger J; Greenspan HK; Dreyfuss J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Aug; 30(8):1496-502. PubMed ID: 18566502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Supervised learning with decision tree-based methods in computational and systems biology.
    Geurts P; Irrthum A; Wehenkel L
    Mol Biosyst; 2009 Dec; 5(12):1593-605. PubMed ID: 20023720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
    Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decision tree and ensemble learning algorithms with their applications in bioinformatics.
    Che D; Liu Q; Rasheed K; Tao X
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():191-9. PubMed ID: 21431559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Practical outcomes of applying ensemble machine learning classifiers to High-Throughput Screening (HTS) data analysis and screening.
    Simmons K; Kinney J; Owens A; Kleier DA; Bloch K; Argentar D; Walsh A; Vaidyanathan G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2196-206. PubMed ID: 18983143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Artificial intelligence approaches for rational drug design and discovery.
    Duch W; Swaminathan K; Meller J
    Curr Pharm Des; 2007; 13(14):1497-508. PubMed ID: 17504169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contemporary QSAR classifiers compared.
    Bruce CL; Melville JL; Pickett SD; Hirst JD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 17238267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Searching for closely related ligands with different mechanisms of action using machine learning and mapping algorithms.
    Balfer J; Vogt M; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Sep; 53(9):2252-74. PubMed ID: 23952618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.