BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19519785)

  • 1. Protists with different feeding modes change biofilm morphology.
    Böhme A; Risse-Buhl U; Küsel K
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 69(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 19519785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grazing resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms depends on type of protective mechanism, developmental stage and protozoan feeding mode.
    Weitere M; Bergfeld T; Rice SA; Matz C; Kjelleberg S
    Environ Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 7(10):1593-601. PubMed ID: 16156732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microscale evaluation of the effects of grazing by invertebrates with contrasting feeding modes on river biofilm architecture and composition.
    Lawrence JR; Scharf B; Packroff G; Neu TR
    Microb Ecol; 2002 Oct; 44(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 12154388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a solution containing citrate/Methylene Blue/parabens on Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and biofilm, and comparison with various heparin solutions.
    Sauer K; Steczko J; Ash SR
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 May; 63(5):937-45. PubMed ID: 19282330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preferential feeding by the ciliates Chilodonella and Tetrahymena spp. and effects of these protozoa on bacterial biofilm structure and composition.
    Dopheide A; Lear G; Stott R; Lewis G
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 Jul; 77(13):4564-72. PubMed ID: 21602372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protozoan grazing and its impact upon population dynamics in biofilm communities.
    Huws SA; McBain AJ; Gilbert P
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 15610437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of three-dimensional biofilm models through direct comparison with confocal microscopy imaging.
    Xavier JB; Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):177-85. PubMed ID: 15303739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microcolony and biofilm formation as a survival strategy for bacteria.
    Johnson LR
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Mar; 251(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18083198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of individual flagellate - bacteria interactions within semi-natural biofilms.
    Erken M; Farrenschon N; Speckmann S; Arndt H; Weitere M
    Protist; 2012 Jul; 163(4):632-42. PubMed ID: 22186014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-dimensional cellular automaton model for mixed-culture biofilm.
    Pizarro GE; García C; Moreno R; Sepúlveda ME
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):193-8. PubMed ID: 15303741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of quorum sensing mediated developmental traits in the resistance of Serratia marcescens biofilms against protozoan grazing.
    Queck SY; Weitere M; Moreno AM; Rice SA; Kjelleberg S
    Environ Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 8(6):1017-25. PubMed ID: 16689722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the dynamics and function of ciliates in sequencing batch biofilm reactors.
    Fried J; Lemmer H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):189-96. PubMed ID: 12701927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction between biofilm development, structure and detachment in rotating annular reactors.
    Garny K; Horn H; Neu TR
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2008 Oct; 31(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 18320233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Growing and analyzing biofilms in flow chambers.
    Tolker-Nielsen T; Sternberg C
    Curr Protoc Microbiol; 2011 May; Chapter 1():Unit 1B.2. PubMed ID: 21538301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compatibility of the green fluorescent protein and a general nucleic acid stain for quantitative description of a Pseudomonas putida biofilm.
    Nancharaiah YV; Venugopalan VP; Wuertz S; Wilderer PA; Hausner M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Feb; 60(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 15590092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm?
    Jefferson KK
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2004 Jul; 236(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 15251193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bacterial biofilm presence in pediatric tracheotomy tubes.
    Perkins J; Mouzakes J; Pereira R; Manning S
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Mar; 130(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 15023844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biofilms in chronic infections - a matter of opportunity - monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections.
    Burmølle M; Thomsen TR; Fazli M; Dige I; Christensen L; Homøe P; Tvede M; Nyvad B; Tolker-Nielsen T; Givskov M; Moser C; Kirketerp-Møller K; Johansen HK; Høiby N; Jensen PØ; Sørensen SJ; Bjarnsholt T
    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 59(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 20602635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Compared viability of planctonic bacteria and bacteria in biofilms by flow cytometry].
    Gellé MP; Jacquelin LF; Choisy C
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2003 Jul; 61(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 12843957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the effect of two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria in vitro: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis.
    Shen Y; Qian W; Chung C; Olsen I; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):981-5. PubMed ID: 19567319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.