These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19519787)

  • 1. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
    Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method.
    Tahmaseb A; van de Weijden JJ; Mercelis P; De Clerck R; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 20369082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study.
    Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Schneider M; Reinert S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15973949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of implant placement using a CAD/CAM surgical guide: an in vitro study.
    Nokar S; Moslehifard E; Bahman T; Bayanzadeh M; Nasirpouri F; Nokar A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):520-6. PubMed ID: 21691598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system.
    Barnea E; Alt I; Kolerman R; Nissan J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 20416521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
    Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production.
    Widmann G; Widmann R; Widmann E; Jaschke W; Bale R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17340899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation.
    Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G
    J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems.
    Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Birkfellner W; Enislidis G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 17974114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted implant placement: scan template, simplant, surgiguide, and SAFE system.
    Tardieu PB; Vrielinck L; Escolano E; Henne M; Tardieu AL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Apr; 27(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 17514886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual variation simulation of CAD/CAM template-guided surgeries performed on human cadavers: Part II.
    Kero T; Pettersson A; Fäldt J; Andersson M; Gillot L; Cannas B; Näsström K; Söderberg R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 20620367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of miniscrew implant placement with a 3-dimensional surgical guide.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1245-52. PubMed ID: 18486791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
    Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.