These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. On the typical development of stereopsis: fine and coarse processing. Giaschi D; Narasimhan S; Solski A; Harrison E; Wilcox LM Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 89():65-71. PubMed ID: 23891704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis. Chen CC; Tyler CW Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of binocular stereopsis in monoptic depth perception. Wilcox LM; Harris JM; McKee SP Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2367-77. PubMed ID: 17651780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereopsis and aging. Norman JF; Norman HF; Craft AE; Walton CL; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL; Wiesemann EY; Crabtree CE Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis. Patel SS; Bedell HE; Sampat P Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 16129469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereoscopic depth perception in peripheral field and global processing of horizontal disparity gradient pattern. Devisme C; Drobe B; Monot A; Droulez J Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 18249435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information. Sakai K; Ogiya M; Hirai Y Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2471-80. PubMed ID: 15961137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual discrimination of local surface structure: slant, tilt, and curvedness. Norman JF; Todd JT; Norman HF; Clayton AM; McBride TR Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1057-69. PubMed ID: 16289208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty. Georgeson MA; Yates TA; Schofield AJ Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2321-8. PubMed ID: 18682260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A specialization for relative disparity in V2. Thomas OM; Cumming BG; Parker AJ Nat Neurosci; 2002 May; 5(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 11967544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry. Li DF; Freeman AW; Alais D Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 15733958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pushing the limits of transparent-motion detection with binocular disparity. Greenwood JA; Edwards M Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2615-24. PubMed ID: 16530242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis. Makino Y; Yano M Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]