These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19520546)

  • 21. Femoral neck fracture after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: prevalence, time to fracture, and outcome after revision.
    Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Revell MP; Pynsent PB
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jan; 28(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 22819379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: survival patterns to 38 years.
    Wroblewski BM; Siney PD; Fleming PA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1015-8. PubMed ID: 17785737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The outcomes of Cormet hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Costa CR; Johnson AJ; Naziri Q; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 22035478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term outcome of a metal-on-polyethylene cementless hip resurfacing.
    Tan TL; Ebramzadeh E; Campbell PA; Al-Hamad M; Amstutz HC
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):802-7. PubMed ID: 24090660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years.
    Howie DW; Campbell D; McGee M; Cornish BL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Jun; 72(5):708-14. PubMed ID: 2355032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metal-metal reactivity: Houston, we have a problem!
    Schmalzried TP; Tiberi JV
    Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):647. PubMed ID: 20839676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing.
    Matthies A; Underwood R; Cann P; Ilo K; Nawaz Z; Skinner J; Hart AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 21357950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure.
    Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Jaiswal A; Richardson JB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1344-50. PubMed ID: 20884969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England. The results at ten years from a regional arthroplasty register.
    Allami MK; Fender D; Khaw FM; Sandher DR; Esler C; Harper WM; Gregg PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Oct; 88(10):1293-8. PubMed ID: 17012416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical and functional outcome of the Birmingham hip resurfacing.
    Van Der Bracht H; Eecken SV; Vyncke D; Van Dooren J; Jansegers E
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Dec; 77(6):771-6. PubMed ID: 22308622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical results of a modular neck hip system: hitting the "bull's-eye" more accurately.
    Duwelius PJ; Hartzband MA; Burkhart R; Carnahan C; Blair S; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Oct; 39(10 Suppl):2-6. PubMed ID: 21290013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Narrowed indications improve outcomes for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Johnson AJ; Zywiel MG; Hooper H; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 22035481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of hip resurfacing arthroplasty: 6 year results from an international multisurgeon prospective cohort study.
    Aulakh TS; Jayasekera N; Singh R; Patel A; Roulahamin N; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 26280956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcomes after revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Gross TP; Liu F
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):219-23. PubMed ID: 24997652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early complications of hip resurfacing.
    Kohan L; Field CJ; Kerr DR
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):997-1002. PubMed ID: 22503492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men.
    Issa K; Palich A; Tatevossian T; Kapadia BH; Naziri Q; Mont MA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 May; 14():161. PubMed ID: 23656900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Eswaramoorthy VK; Biant LC; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Nov; 91(11):1454-8. PubMed ID: 19880889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Wisk LE; Le Duff MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Feb; 26(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 20452178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis.
    Ollivere B; Darrah C; Barker T; Nolan J; Porteous MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1025-30. PubMed ID: 19651828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.