These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19520546)
41. Hip resurfacing offers no benefits over total hip replacement in some patients, finds study. Kmietowicz Z BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6627. PubMed ID: 23028108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term clinical and radiographic outcome. Witzleb WC; Arnold M; Krummenauer F; Knecht A; Ranisch H; Günther KP Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18226996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. High short-term loosening rates with the Wagner Standard Cup. Ros V; Martínez Alvarez M; Fernández S; Girvent R; Carballo A; Gili G; Torner P J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):172-5. PubMed ID: 23643713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Early failure of the Polarstem total hip arthroplasty--can the Australian NJR tell us the full story? Lee PY; Evans AR J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):609-11. PubMed ID: 23993433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Total hip arthroplasty modular neck failure. Skendzel JG; Blaha JD; Urquhart AG J Arthroplasty; 2011 Feb; 26(2):338.e1-4. PubMed ID: 20381993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. Stulberg BN; Trier KK; Naughton M; Zadzilka JD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():21-6. PubMed ID: 18676932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in severely obese patients. Stein MI; Perrone M; Palumbo BT; Cain R; Gaskins RB; Raterman S Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2013 Oct; 42(10):451-4. PubMed ID: 24278903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Sporting activity after hip resurfacing: changes over time. Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC Orthop Clin North Am; 2011 Apr; 42(2):161-7, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 21435492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients 40 years old and younger. Reito A; Eskelinen A; Puolakka T; Pajamäki J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Feb; 133(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 23135156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Hip arthroplasty in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Hsieh PH; Chen LH; Lee MS; Chen CH; Yang WE; Shih CH J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2003 Aug; 85(6):818-21. PubMed ID: 12931797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hip Resurfacing Revision: A Cohort Study Into the Second Decade After the Operation. Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):1444-52. PubMed ID: 27605688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years. Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Shears E; Pynsent PB J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21196539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Arthroscopy of the hip in patients following joint replacement. Bajwa AS; Villar RN J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jul; 93(7):890-6. PubMed ID: 21705559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Revision arthroplasty of the hip joint. A retrospective analysis. Arajärvi E; Santavirta S Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978); 1987; 106(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 3606354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty. Head WC Orthop Clin North Am; 1982 Oct; 13(4):789-97. PubMed ID: 7145347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Mont MA; Seyler TM; Ulrich SD; Beaule PE; Boyd HS; Grecula MJ; Goldberg VM; Kennedy WR; Marker DR; Schmalzried TP; Sparling EA; Vail TP; Amstutz HC Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():63-70. PubMed ID: 17891034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement. Field RE; Cronin MD; Singh PJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 May; 87(5):618-22. PubMed ID: 15855360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty. Itayem R; Arndt A; McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Lundberg A J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1140-3. PubMed ID: 17905947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. Khan M; Kuiper JH; Edwards D; Robinson E; Richardson JB J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1044-50. PubMed ID: 18834698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [National Registry of Joint Replacement in the Czech Republic. Hip joint replacement. Selected methods and their analysis 2003-2009]. Vavrik P; Landor I; Popelka S; Kasal P; Fialka R; Hach J; Holub J Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Oct; 77 Suppl():1-75. PubMed ID: 21360857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]