These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Automatic detection of the breast border and nipple position on digital mammograms using genetic algorithm for asymmetry approach to detection of microcalcifications. Karnan M; Thangavel K Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Jul; 87(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17543415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis. Brandt SS; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Nielsen M IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1841-51. PubMed ID: 21609879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method. Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangieri FF; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):948-57. PubMed ID: 23508373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views. Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple method for automatically locating the nipple on mammograms. Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):483-94. PubMed ID: 9368104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robust Automatic Pectoral Muscle Segmentation from Mammograms Using Texture Gradient and Euclidean Distance Regression. Bora VB; Kothari AG; Keskar AG J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 26259521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography. Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter. Vikhe PS; Thool VR J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic extraction of pectoral muscle in the MLO view of mammograms. Feudjio CK; Klein J; Tiedeu A; Colot O Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(23):8493-515. PubMed ID: 24240510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review. Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua KC; Min LC; Abraham KT Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23270962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A heuristic approach to automated nipple detection in digital mammograms. Jas M; Mukhopadhyay S; Chakraborty J; Sadhu A; Khandelwal N J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):932-40. PubMed ID: 23423610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms. Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):562-80. PubMed ID: 19816741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic positioning: evaluation from the view box. Bassett LW; Hirbawi IA; DeBruhl N; Hayes MK Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):803-6. PubMed ID: 8351351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlating locations in ipsilateral breast tomosynthesis views using an analytical hemispherical compression model. van Schie G; Tanner C; Snoeren P; Samulski M; Leifland K; Wallis MG; Karssemeijer N Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(15):4715-30. PubMed ID: 21737868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]