BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19520632)

  • 21. A Radiomic feature-based Nipple Detection Algorithm on Digital Mammography.
    Jiang J; Zhang Y; Lu Y; Guo Y; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4381-4391. PubMed ID: 31242321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammography image quality: model for predicting compliance with posterior nipple line criterion.
    Spuur K; Hung WT; Poulos A; Rickard M
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):713-8. PubMed ID: 20621431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.
    Zhou C; Wei J; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Douglas JA
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2289-99. PubMed ID: 20527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automatic Pectoral Muscle Region Segmentation in Mammograms Using Genetic Algorithm and Morphological Selection.
    Shen R; Yan K; Xiao F; Chang J; Jiang C; Zhou K
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):680-691. PubMed ID: 29582242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Correa JL; Vidal JJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1996 May; 49(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8800610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms.
    Rampun A; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Winder J
    Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():28-41. PubMed ID: 28606722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Segmentation of regions of interest in mammograms in a topographic approach.
    Hong BW; Sohn BS
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2010 Jan; 14(1):129-39. PubMed ID: 19846384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Mustra M; Grgic M; Rangayyan RM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Jul; 54(7):1003-24. PubMed ID: 26546074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms.
    Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 12(3):3285. PubMed ID: 21844845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 14964567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MRT letter: segmentation and texture-based classification of breast mammogram images.
    Naveed N; Jaffar MA; Choi TS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2011 Nov; 74(11):985-7. PubMed ID: 21898670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pectoral muscle removal in mammogram images: A novel approach for improved accuracy and efficiency.
    Chen S; Bennett DL; Colditz GA; Jiang S
    Cancer Causes Control; 2024 Jan; 35(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 37676616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
    Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 8208220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification and segmentation of obscure pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique mammograms.
    Wei CH; Gwo CY; Huang PJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150802. PubMed ID: 27043966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated registration of diagnostic to prediagnostic x-ray mammograms: evaluation and comparison to radiologists' accuracy.
    Pinto Pereira SM; Hipwell JH; McCormack VA; Tanner C; Moss SM; Wilkinson LS; Khoo LA; Pagliari C; Skippage PL; Kliger CJ; Hawkes DJ; Silva IM
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4530-9. PubMed ID: 20964170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breast pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms using a modified holistically-nested edge detection network.
    Rampun A; López-Linares K; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Wang H; Ocaña IG; Maclair G; Zwiggelaar R; González Ballester MA; Macía I
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Oct; 57():1-17. PubMed ID: 31254729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast Positioning during Mammography: Mistakes to be Avoided.
    Popli MB; Teotia R; Narang M; Krishna H
    Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2014; 8():119-24. PubMed ID: 25125982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.