These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. A comparison between subjective refraction and aberrometry-derived refraction in keratoconus patients and control subjects. Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Radhakrishnan H Curr Eye Res; 2010 Aug; 35(8):703-14. PubMed ID: 20673047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Refractive and aberrometric outcomes of intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus: mechanical versus femtosecond-assisted procedures. Piñero DP; Alio JL; El Kady B; Coskunseven E; Morbelli H; Uceda-Montanes A; Maldonado MJ; Cuevas D; Pascual I Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1675-87. PubMed ID: 19643498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accommodative lag and fluctuations when optical aberrations are manipulated. Gambra E; Sawides L; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):4.1-15. PubMed ID: 19761295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Changes in through-focus spatial visual performance with adaptive optics correction of monochromatic aberrations. Guo H; Atchison DA; Birt BJ Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1804-11. PubMed ID: 18597809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Benefit of adaptive optics aberration correction at preferred retinal locus. Baskaran K; Rosén R; Lewis P; Unsbo P; Gustafsson J Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1417-23. PubMed ID: 22842306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Zernike polynomial fitting fails to represent all visually significant corneal aberrations. Smolek MK; Klyce SD Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):4676-81. PubMed ID: 14578385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]