These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19521289)

  • 1. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
    Gethin G; Cowman S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.
    Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of venous leg ulcers with a laser-based three-dimensional method: comparison to computer planimetry with photography.
    Kecelj-Leskovec N; Jezersek M; Mozina J; Pavlović MD; Lunder T
    Wound Repair Regen; 2007; 15(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 17971024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison of digital planimetry and transparency tracing based methods for measuring diabetic cutaneous ulcer surface area].
    Wang Y; Liu G; Yuan N; Ran X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 18630436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement.
    Körber A; Rietkötter J; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Oct; 4(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 17010174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
    Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.
    Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ
    Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image analysis of chronic wounds for determining the surface area.
    Papazoglou ES; Zubkov L; Mao X; Neidrauer M; Rannou N; Weingarten MS
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 20492631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lower extremity ulcer image segmentation of visual and near-infrared imagery.
    Bochko V; Välisuo P; Harju T; Alander J
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 May; 16(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 20456099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Conventional versus digital planimetry of optic disc photograph: a clinical comparative study].
    Nguyen NX; Horn FK; Langenbucher A; Mardin CY
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Nov; 218(11):727-32. PubMed ID: 11731900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice.
    Flanagan M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Oct; 49(10):28-40. PubMed ID: 14652419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of quantitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer measurements.
    Cutler NR; George R; Seifert RD; Brunelle R; Sramek JJ; McNeill K; Boyd WM
    Decubitus; 1993 Nov; 6(6):22-30. PubMed ID: 8286024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wound shape geometry measurements correlate to eventual wound healing.
    Cardinal M; Eisenbud DE; Armstrong DG
    Wound Repair Regen; 2009; 17(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19320884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability.
    Wendelken ME; Berg WT; Lichtenstein P; Markowitz L; Comfort C; Alvarez OM
    Wounds; 2011 Sep; 23(9):267-75. PubMed ID: 25879267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [3-dimensional documentation of wound-healing].
    Körber A; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
    Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Apr; 131 Suppl 1():S174-6. PubMed ID: 16575675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.