612 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19521993)
1. Combined use of Impella device and intra-aortic balloon pump to improve survival in a patient in profound cardiogenic shock post cardiac arrest.
Gupta A; Allaqaband S; Bajwa T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 74(6):975-6. PubMed ID: 19521993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motorboat or canoe? Impeller, propeller, or paddle?
Butman SM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 74(6):977-8. PubMed ID: 19902514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Successful combined use of Impella Recover 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction.
Wiktor DM; Sawlani N; Kanthi Y; Sipahi I; Fang JC; Blitz A
ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 20938341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock.
Windecker S
Curr Opin Crit Care; 2007 Oct; 13(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 17762230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.
Cheng JM; den Uil CA; Hoeks SE; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
Eur Heart J; 2009 Sep; 30(17):2102-8. PubMed ID: 19617601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical versus pharmacologic support for cardiogenic shock.
Dhar G; Jolly N
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 20049971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of the Impella 2.5 system alone, after and in combination with an intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock: case description and review of the literature.
Cubeddu RJ; Lago R; Horvath SA; Vignola PA; O'Neill W; Palacios IF
EuroIntervention; 2012 Apr; 7(12):1453-60. PubMed ID: 22522555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined hemodynamic support with the Impella 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump for management of refractory cardiogenic shock.
Pavlidis AN; Redwood SR; Clapp BR
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):E50-1. PubMed ID: 24791724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term survival using intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous right ventricular assist device for biventricular mechanical support of cardiogenic shock.
Atwater BD; Nee LM; Gimelli G
J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Jul; 20(7):E205-7. PubMed ID: 18599903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The right axillary artery approach for the Impella Recover LP 5.0 microaxial pump.
Sassard T; Scalabre A; Bonnefoy E; Sanchez I; Farhat F; Jegaden O
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1468-70. PubMed ID: 18355563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impella Recover microaxial left ventricular assist device reduces mortality for postcardiotomy failure: a three-center experience.
Siegenthaler MP; Brehm K; Strecker T; Hanke T; Nötzold A; Olschewski M; Weyand M; Sievers H; Beyersdorf F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 127(3):812-22. PubMed ID: 15001911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5.
Manzo-Silberman S; Fichet J; Mathonnet A; Varenne O; Ricome S; Chaib A; Zuber B; Spaulding C; Cariou A
Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 23069592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of support capabilities of intra-aortic balloon pump and Impella 2.5 left percutaneous.
Schampaert S; van't Veer M; van de Vosse FN; Pijls NH; de Mol BA; Rutten MC
Artif Organs; 2011 Sep; 35(9):893-901. PubMed ID: 21819436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percutaneous ventricular assist device support during off-pump surgical coronary revascularization.
Gregoric ID; Poglajen G; Span M; Frazier OH; Loyalka P; Kar B
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 86(2):637-9. PubMed ID: 18640347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commentary: successful combined use of the Impella Recover 2.5 device and intraaortic balloon pump support for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.
El Oakley R
ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):517-8. PubMed ID: 21245797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Short and intermediate term clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with aortic counterpulsation].
Fornaro G; Prando MD; Parodi F; Cordero G; Sansa M; Bongo AS; Campi A; Aralda D; Dellavesa P; Aina F; Lazzero M; Cernigliaro C
G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 26(12):1385-99. PubMed ID: 9162668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.
Idelchik GM; Simpson L; Civitello AB; Loyalka P; Gregoric ID; Delgado R; Kar B
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2008 Jan; 27(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 18187095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.
Seyfarth M; Sibbing D; Bauer I; Fröhlich G; Bott-Flügel L; Byrne R; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Schömig A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(19):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19007597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiogenic shock secondary to severe acute ischemic mitral regurgitation managed with an Impella 2.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device.
Harmon L; Boccalandro F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 79(7):1129-34. PubMed ID: 21805597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The Impella system for mechanical support and myocardial recovery].
Engström AE; de Mol BA; Lagrand WK; Henriques JP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154(45):A2699. PubMed ID: 21118589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
