These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19522323)

  • 1. Do pictures of faces, and which ones, capture attention in the inattentional-blindness paradigm?
    Devue C; Laloyaux C; Feyers D; Theeuwes J; Brédart S
    Perception; 2009; 38(4):552-68. PubMed ID: 19522323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bodies capture attention when nothing is expected.
    Downing PE; Bray D; Rogers J; Childs C
    Cognition; 2004 Aug; 93(1):B27-38. PubMed ID: 15110728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional load and the consciousness of one's own name.
    Lin SH; Yeh YY
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 May; 26():197-203. PubMed ID: 24762974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gatecrashing the visual cocktail party: How visual and semantic similarity modulate the own name benefit in the attentional blink.
    Dent K; Cole GG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1102-1111. PubMed ID: 29747555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of emotional valence and age of faces on adults and children's inattentional blindness.
    Wei X; Zhang H; Hu J; Xu J; Wang J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1571-1580. PubMed ID: 33409905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are Familiar Objects More Likely to Be Noticed in an Inattentional Blindness Task?
    Ding Y; Simons DJ; Hults CM; Raja R
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):28. PubMed ID: 38405633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities.
    Sinnett S; Costa A; Soto-Faraco S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Aug; 59(8):1425-42. PubMed ID: 16846969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
    Keyes H; Dlugokencka A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110792. PubMed ID: 25338170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention.
    Newby EA; Rock I
    Perception; 1998; 27(9):1025-40. PubMed ID: 10341933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familiarity for famous faces and names is not equally subtended by the right and left temporal poles. Evidence from an rTMS study.
    Ranieri F; Ferraccioli M; Stampanoni Bassi M; Musumeci G; Di Lazzaro V; Gainotti G; Marra C
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Nov; 125():15-23. PubMed ID: 26211873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surprise capture and inattentional blindness.
    Horstmann G; Ansorge U
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():237-249. PubMed ID: 27665396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short article one's own face is hard to ignore.
    Brédart S; Delchambre M; Laureys S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16556557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How multiple repetitions influence the processing of self-, famous and unknown names and faces: an ERP study.
    Tacikowski P; Jednoróg K; Marchewka A; Nowicka A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 21035509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mirror, mirror on the wall: enhancement in self-recognition.
    Epley N; Whitchurch E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1159-70. PubMed ID: 18550861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Faces capture spatial attention only when we want them to: An inattentional blindness EEG study.
    Qiu Z; Lei X; Becker SI; Pegna AJ
    Biol Psychol; 2023 Oct; 183():108665. PubMed ID: 37619811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Not all faces are processed equally: evidence for featural rather than holistic processing of one's own face in a face-imaging task.
    Greenberg SN; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 19271862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Faces do not capture special attention in children with autism spectrum disorder: a change blindness study.
    Kikuchi Y; Senju A; Tojo Y; Osanai H; Hasegawa T
    Child Dev; 2009; 80(5):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19765009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The bilateral field advantage in a sequential face-name matching task with famous and nonfamous faces.
    Collin CA; Byrne S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20384415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-Related Effects of Stimulus Type and Congruency on Inattentional Blindness.
    Liu HH
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():794. PubMed ID: 29875724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.
    Barton JJ; Radcliffe N; Cherkasova MV; Edelman J; Intriligator JM
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1089-105. PubMed ID: 17076068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.