1116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19523024)
1. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Phillips KM
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 12942055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of second pour casts using dual-arch impressions.
Schwartz RS; Davis RD
Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 1290607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
Breeding LC; Dixon DL
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 19418862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
Ishida K
Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique.
Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the quality of clinical procedures and technical standards of dental laboratories in fixed partial denture therapy.
Albashaireh ZS; Alnegrish AS
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 10635191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
Marder MZ; Marder RW
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.
Brunton PA; Christensen GJ; Cheung SW; Burke FJ; Wilson NH
Br Dent J; 2005 Jan; 198(2):99-103; discussion 89. PubMed ID: 15702109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
