These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19523024)

  • 21. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Impressions in conservative dentistry].
    Charpentier J
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 16193849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
    Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of the Dies Affected by Tray Type, Material Viscosity, and Pouring Sequence of Dual and Single Arch Impressions- An In vitro Study.
    Kulkarni PR; Kulkarni RS; Shah RJ; Chhajlani R; Saklecha B; Maru K
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):ZC128-ZC135. PubMed ID: 28571280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [
    Xu XX; Cao Y; Zhao YJ; Jia L; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 33550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy.
    Davis RD; Schwartz RS
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 1854447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A modified indirect working die technique for fabricating provisional restorations for multiple teeth.
    Antonelli JR; Gulker I
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):392-6. PubMed ID: 11203955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-way trays: easy to use and abuse.
    Pesun IJ; Swain VL
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec; 74(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 19126360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work--an investigation and review.
    Carrotte PV; Johnson A; Winstanley RB
    Br Dent J; 1998 Dec 12-26; 185(11-12):580-5. PubMed ID: 9885431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions.
    Samet N; Shohat M; Livny A; Weiss EI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 16046964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of impression levels and trays on the accuracy of impressions taken from angulated implants.
    Geramipanah F; Sahebi M; Davari M; Hajimahmoudi M; Rakhshan V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1098-105. PubMed ID: 24934081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term survivals of 'direct-wax' cast gold onlays: a retrospective study in a general dental practice.
    Bandlish LK; Mariatos G
    Br Dent J; 2009 Aug; 207(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 19662053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Functional impression and jaw registration: a single session procedure for the construction of complete dentures.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Kettner N; Reppert G; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):554-61. PubMed ID: 15189312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of successive casts for full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Dounis KS; Dounis G; Ditmyer MM; Ziebert GJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 20859561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.