151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19523086)
1. How well does record abstraction quantify the content of optometric eye examinations in the UK?
Shah R; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 19523086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of standardised patients, record abstraction and clinical vignettes for the purpose of measuring clinical practice.
Shah R; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):209-24. PubMed ID: 20444128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The content of optometric eye examinations for a presbyopic patient presenting with symptoms of flashing lights.
Shah R; Edgar DF; Harle DE; Weddell L; Austen DP; Burghardt D; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):105-26. PubMed ID: 19236581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The content of optometric eye examinations for a young myope with headaches.
Shah R; Edgar DF; Rabbetts R; Blakeney SL; Charlesworth P; Harle DE; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):404-21. PubMed ID: 18761478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical record.
Dresselhaus TR; Luck J; Peabody JW
J Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; 28(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 12356955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glaucoma detection: the content of optometric eye examinations for a presbyopic patient of African racial descent.
Shah R; Edgar DF; Spry PG; Harper RA; Kotecha A; Rughani S; Evans BJ
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Apr; 93(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 19060011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.
Peabody JW; Luck J; Glassman P; Dresselhaus TR; Lee M
JAMA; 2000 Apr; 283(13):1715-22. PubMed ID: 10755498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fielding incognito standardised patients as 'known' patients in a controlled trial in general practice.
Maiburg BH; Rethans JJ; van Erk IM; Mathus-Vliegen LM; van Ree JW
Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1229-35. PubMed ID: 15566533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does optometrists' self-reported practice in glaucoma detection predict actual practice as determined by standardised patients?
Theodossiades J; Myint J; Murdoch IE; Edgar DF; Lawrenson JG
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 22329780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.
Luck J; Peabody JW; Dresselhaus TR; Lee M; Glassman P
Am J Med; 2000 Jun; 108(8):642-9. PubMed ID: 10856412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring clinical practice.
Shah R; Edgar D; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Mar; 27(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 17324200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter?
Hillier JC; Tattersall DJ; Gleeson FV
Clin Radiol; 2004 Feb; 59(2):159-62; discussion 157-8. PubMed ID: 14746785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How accurate is the medical record? A comparison of the physician's note with a concealed audio recording in unannounced standardized patient encounters.
Weiner SJ; Wang S; Kelly B; Sharma G; Schwartz A
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 May; 27(5):770-775. PubMed ID: 32330258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of standardised patients in optometry training.
Shah R; Ctori I; Edgar DF; Parker P
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Nov; 104(8):848-853. PubMed ID: 33725470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinicolegal aspects of practice guidelines for pediatric eye and vision examination.
Hatch SW
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Aug; 66(8):501-9. PubMed ID: 7494086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short communication: plain film reporting by radiographers--a feasibility study.
Robinson PJ
Br J Radiol; 1996 Dec; 69(828):1171-4. PubMed ID: 9135475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Competency of 1-Year Trained Vision Technicians in Andhra Pradesh, India.
Paudel P; Cronjé S; O'Connor PM; Rao GN; Holden BA
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2015; 22(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 26653263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing accuracy of referral and the likelihood of false positive referral by optometrists in Bradford, United Kingdom.
Davey CJ; Scally AJ; Green C; Mitchell ES; Elliott DB
J Optom; 2016; 9(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 26614021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using standardised patients to assess the quality of medical records: an application and evidence from rural China.
Wu Y; Zhou H; Ma X; Shi Y; Xue H; Zhou C; Yi H; Medina A; Li J; Sylvia S
BMJ Qual Saf; 2020 Jun; 29(6):491-498. PubMed ID: 31776199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal clinical management of eye problems: the role of optometrists in managed care plans.
Soroka M; Krumholz DM; Krasner M; Portello J
Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):781-90. PubMed ID: 11145303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]