151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19523086)
21. Corridor consultations and the medical microbiological record: is patient safety at risk?
Heard SR; Roberts C; Furrows SJ; Kelsey M; Southgate L;
J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 56(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 12499432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optometric record keeping in a comprehensive health care environment.
Rivard B
Optom Vis Sci; 1996 May; 73(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 8771579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of patient management skills and clinical skills of practising doctors using computer-based case simulations and standardised patients.
Hawkins R; MacKrell Gaglione M; LaDuca T; Leung C; Sample L; Gliva-McConvey G; Liston W; De Champlain A; Ciccone A
Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 38(9):958-68. PubMed ID: 15327677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Caught in the act? Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of physician detection of unannounced standardized patients.
Franz CE; Epstein R; Miller KN; Brown A; Song J; Feldman M; Franks P; Kelly-Reif S; Kravitz RL
Health Serv Res; 2006 Dec; 41(6):2290-302. PubMed ID: 17116121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings.
Luck J; Peabody JW
BMJ; 2002 Sep; 325(7366):679. PubMed ID: 12351358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record.
Dresselhaus TR; Peabody JW; Lee M; Wang MM; Luck J
J Gen Intern Med; 2000 Nov; 15(11):782-8. PubMed ID: 11119170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Therapeutic endorsement enhances compliance with national glaucoma guidelines in Australian and New Zealand optometrists.
Zangerl B; Hayen A; Mitchell P; Jamous KF; Stapleton F; Kalloniatis M
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 25684127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis.
Mitchell AJ; Vaze A; Rao S
Lancet; 2009 Aug; 374(9690):609-19. PubMed ID: 19640579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Can data in optometric practice be used to provide an evidence base for ophthalmic public health?
Slade SV; Davey CJ; Shickle D
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):503-11. PubMed ID: 27199180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care.
Dresselhaus TR; Peabody JW; Luck J; Bertenthal D
J Gen Intern Med; 2004 Oct; 19(10):1013-8. PubMed ID: 15482553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Standardized patient methodology to assess refractive error reproducibility.
Shah R; Edgar DF; Rabbetts R; Harle DE; Evans BJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):517-28. PubMed ID: 19319010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.
Rethans JJ; Martin E; Metsemakers J
Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Apr; 44(381):153-6. PubMed ID: 8185988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the quality of primary healthcare in seven Chinese provinces with unannounced standardised patients: protocol of a cross-sectional survey.
Xu DR; Hu M; He W; Liao J; Cai Y; Sylvia S; Hanson K; Chen Y; Pan J; Zhou Z; Zhang N; Tang C; Wang X; Rozelle S; He H; Wang H; Chan G; Melipillán ER; Zhou W; Gong W
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e023997. PubMed ID: 30765399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.
Hamilton WT; Round AP; Sharp D; Peters TJ
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 14960216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality assurance best practices for simulation-based examinations.
Furman GE; Smee S; Wilson C
Simul Healthc; 2010 Aug; 5(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 21330801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool.
Battles JB; Wilkinson SL; Lee SJ
Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Oct; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i46-50. PubMed ID: 15465955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Internet-based prescription of sildenafil: a 2104-patient series.
Jones MJ
J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(1):E2. PubMed ID: 11720944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of the inclusion of simulated patient ratings on the reliability of OSCE assessments under the borderline regression method.
Homer M; Pell G
Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):420-5. PubMed ID: 19142798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Which data source in clinical performance assessment? A pilot study comparing self-recording with patient records and observation.
Spies TH; Mokkink HG; De Vries Robbé PF; Grol RP
Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Feb; 16(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15020562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of standardized patient instruction.
Johnson JA; Kopp KC
J Dent Educ; 1996 Mar; 60(3):262-66. PubMed ID: 8594109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
