BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19523377)

  • 1. Towards functional genomics in fish using quantitative proteomics.
    Martyniuk CJ; Denslow ND
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2009; 164(2-3):135-41. PubMed ID: 19523377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of protein changes during platelet storage requires complementary proteomic approaches.
    Thon JN; Schubert P; Duguay M; Serrano K; Lin S; Kast J; Devine DV
    Transfusion; 2008 Mar; 48(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 18067510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative proteomic profiles of androgen receptor signaling in the liver of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas).
    Martyniuk CJ; Alvarez S; McClung S; Villeneuve DL; Ankley GT; Denslow ND
    J Proteome Res; 2009 May; 8(5):2186-200. PubMed ID: 19267455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amino acid-coded tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics.
    Chen X; Sun L; Yu Y; Xue Y; Yang P
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2007 Feb; 4(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 17288513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein markers of ischemic insult in brain endothelial cells identified using 2D gel electrophoresis and ICAT-based quantitative proteomics.
    Haqqani AS; Kelly J; Baumann E; Haseloff RF; Blasig IE; Stanimirovic DB
    J Proteome Res; 2007 Jan; 6(1):226-39. PubMed ID: 17203967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive analysis of the Brassica juncea root proteome in response to cadmium exposure by complementary proteomic approaches.
    Alvarez S; Berla BM; Sheffield J; Cahoon RE; Jez JM; Hicks LM
    Proteomics; 2009 May; 9(9):2419-31. PubMed ID: 19343712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plant proteome analysis: a 2006 update.
    Jorrín JV; Maldonado AM; Castillejo MA
    Proteomics; 2007 Aug; 7(16):2947-62. PubMed ID: 17654459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative proteomics for identification of cancer biomarkers.
    Chaerkady R; Pandey A
    Proteomics Clin Appl; 2007 Sep; 1(9):1080-9. PubMed ID: 21136759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of quantitative methods for proteomic studies.
    Fenselau C
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2007 Aug; 855(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 17161666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of difference in-gel electrophoresis for quantitation of protein expression.
    Sapra R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 492():93-112. PubMed ID: 19241028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional genomics and proteomics of the cellular osmotic stress response in 'non-model' organisms.
    Kültz D; Fiol D; Valkova N; Gomez-Jimenez S; Chan SY; Lee J
    J Exp Biol; 2007 May; 210(Pt 9):1593-601. PubMed ID: 17449824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2D electrophoresis-based expression proteomics: a microbiologist's perspective.
    Sá-Correia I; Teixeira MC
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2010 Dec; 7(6):943-53. PubMed ID: 21142894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional Genomics meets neurodegenerative disorders Part I: transcriptomic and proteomic technology.
    David DC; Hoerndli F; Götz J
    Prog Neurobiol; 2005 Jun; 76(3):153-68. PubMed ID: 16168556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the consistency of proteome quantitation using two-dimensional electrophoresis and shotgun isobaric tagging in Escherichia coli cells.
    Choe LH; Aggarwal K; Franck Z; Lee KH
    Electrophoresis; 2005 Jun; 26(12):2437-49. PubMed ID: 15924362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proteomics: recent applications and new technologies.
    Elrick MM; Walgren JL; Mitchell MD; Thompson DC
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2006 May; 98(5):432-41. PubMed ID: 16635100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular targets of TBBPA in zebrafish analysed through integration of genomic and proteomic approaches.
    De Wit M; Keil D; Remmerie N; van der Ven K; van den Brandhof EJ; Knapen D; Witters E; De Coen W
    Chemosphere; 2008 Dec; 74(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 18976794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concepts and approaches towards understanding the cellular redox proteome.
    Ströher E; Dietz KJ
    Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2006 Jul; 8(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 16906481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protein profiling of human postmortem brain using 2-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE).
    Swatton JE; Prabakaran S; Karp NA; Lilley KS; Bahn S
    Mol Psychiatry; 2004 Feb; 9(2):128-43. PubMed ID: 14708031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shotgun proteomics using the iTRAQ isobaric tags.
    Aggarwal K; Choe LH; Lee KH
    Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2006 Jun; 5(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 16772272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic and proteomic approaches in comparative biochemistry and physiology.
    Storey KB
    Physiol Biochem Zool; 2006; 79(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 16555191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.