393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19523854)
1. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography?
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Beger S; Freiberg C; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19862654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 20657229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Signal intensity of normal breast tissue at MR mammography on midfield: applying a random coefficient model evaluating the effect of doubling the contrast dose.
Marklund M; Christensen R; Torp-Pedersen S; Thomsen C; Nolsøe CP
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 17961948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comment on ADC reductions in postcontrast breast tumors.
Ramadan S; Mulkern RV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):262; author reply 263-4. PubMed ID: 20027600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can voxel based morphometry, manual segmentation and automated segmentation equally detect hippocampal volume differences in acute depression?
Bergouignan L; Chupin M; Czechowska Y; Kinkingnéhun S; Lemogne C; Le Bastard G; Lepage M; Garnero L; Colliot O; Fossati P
Neuroimage; 2009 Mar; 45(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 19071222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Gröschel T; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S4-5. PubMed ID: 23083596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative 2- and 3-dimensional analysis of pharmacokinetic model-derived variables for breast lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Jaeger HJ; Maderwald S; Muehler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Eur J Radiol; 2008 May; 66(2):300-8. PubMed ID: 17658235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions.
Kono R; Fujimoto K; Terasaki H; Müller NL; Kato S; Sadohara J; Hayabuchi N; Takamori S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 17179342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography compared with conventional mammography.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Pfleiderer SO; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 19006771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H
Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
