2458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19523892)
1. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Modified Exeter technique in revision hip surgery].
de Thomasson E; Guingand O; Terracher R; Mazel C
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 18555861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade.
Ota J; Cook JL; Lewis DD; Tomlinson JL; Fox DB; Cook CR; Schultz LG; Brumitt J
Vet Surg; 2005; 34(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16212589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone substitution in revision hip replacement.
Nich C; Sedel L
Int Orthop; 2006 Dec; 30(6):525-31. PubMed ID: 16741734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes at least 10 years after cemented PF® (Zimmer) total hip arthroplasty: 83 cases.
Aubault M; Druon J; Le Nail L; Rosset P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Jun; 99(4 Suppl):S235-9. PubMed ID: 23628004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total hip arthroplasty dislocation rate following isolated cup revision using Hueter's direct anterior approach on a fracture table.
Cogan A; Klouche S; Mamoudy P; Sariali E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Sep; 97(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 21782540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years.
Haydon CM; Mehin R; Burnett S; Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 15173290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
