BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

19 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19524221)

  • 1. Improved PAA algorithm for breast mass detection in mammograms.
    Liu W; Zeng P; Jiang J; Chen J; Chen L; Hu C; Jian W; Diao X; Wang X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jun; 251():108211. PubMed ID: 38744058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Representation of lesion similarity by use of multidimensional scaling for breast masses on mammograms.
    Muramatsu C; Nishimura K; Endo T; Oiwa M; Shiraiwa M; Doi K; Fujita H
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):740-7. PubMed ID: 23306711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introducing kernel based morphology as an enhancement method for mass classification on mammography.
    Amirzadi A; Azmi R
    J Med Signals Sens; 2013 Apr; 3(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 24098865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1455-65. PubMed ID: 11488579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
    Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of tolerant features for characterization of masses in mammograms.
    Rojas-Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Aug; 39(8):678-88. PubMed ID: 19524221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
    Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 1.