These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19524597)

  • 1. Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 2: Theoretical and numerical analysis.
    Moreo P; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 19524597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model.
    Moreo P; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18762197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
    Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
    Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A finite element method approach for the mechanobiological modeling of the osseointegration of a dental implant.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Landinez P NS; Garzón-Alvarado DA; Casale R MC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Mar; 101(3):297-314. PubMed ID: 21183241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical simulation of bone regeneration in a bone chamber.
    Geris L; Vandamme K; Naert I; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H
    J Dent Res; 2009 Feb; 88(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19278988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
    Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational simulation of dental implant osseointegration through resonance frequency analysis.
    Pérez MA; Moreo P; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):316-25. PubMed ID: 17976627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mathematical model of the coagulation in the bone-dental implant interface.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Landinez P NS; Garzón-Alvarado DA
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Oct; 40(10):791-801. PubMed ID: 20810103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains.
    Simmons CA; Meguid SA; Pilliar RM
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Mar; 19(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 11347689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing.
    Davies JE
    J Dent Educ; 2003 Aug; 67(8):932-49. PubMed ID: 12959168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
    Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.