These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19524832)

  • 1. Comparison of the effects of Hawley and perfector/spring aligner retainers on postorthodontic occlusion.
    Horton JK; Buschang PH; Oliver DR; Behrents RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 19524832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study.
    Bauer EM; Behrents R; Oliver DR; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):853-60. PubMed ID: 20578855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers.
    Sauget E; Covell DA; Boero RP; Lieber WS
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 9188967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Rowland H; Hichens L; Williams A; Hills D; Killingback N; Ewings P; Clark S; Ireland AJ; Sandy JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 18068589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts.
    Dinçer M; Isik Aslan B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 19726491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occlusal contacts with different retention procedures in 1-year follow-up period.
    Başçiftçi FA; Uysal T; Sari Z; Inan O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 17346591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion.
    Owens S; Buschang PH; Throckmorton GS; Palmer L; English J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jun; 121(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 12080313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the effects of modified and full-coverage thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M; Salmanli O; Qasem MA
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e198-208. PubMed ID: 23646330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase.
    Pratt MC; Kluemper GT; Lindstrom AF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21803257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in functional occlusion during the postorthodontic retention period: a prospective longitudinal clinical study.
    Morton S; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19268828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial.
    Shawesh M; Bhatti B; Usmani T; Mandall N
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Apr; 32(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 19797411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period.
    Vagdouti G; Karvouni E; Bitsanis E; Koletsi D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):717-726.e2. PubMed ID: 31784005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
    Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study.
    Kumar AG; Bansal A
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21696115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States.
    Valiathan M; Hughes E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):170-7; discussion 177. PubMed ID: 20152670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new method of evaluating posterior occlusion and its relation to posttreatment occlusal changes.
    Parkinson CE; Buschang PH; Behrents RG; Throckmorton GS; English JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Nov; 120(5):503-12. PubMed ID: 11709669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear.
    Thickett E; Power S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19828592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical evaluation of lingual fixed retainer combined with Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer].
    Xu XC; Li RM; Tang GH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 22241313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of salivary bisphenol A levels in patients wearing vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: An in-vivo study.
    Raghavan AS; Pottipalli Sathyanarayana H; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):471-476. PubMed ID: 28257731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Stability of the Results of Orthodontic Treatment and Gingival Health between Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers.
    Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Farshidnia S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):443-449. PubMed ID: 29728551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.