These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19524905)

  • 1. Does placing screws off-centre in tubular bone alter their pullout strength?
    Acharya AV; Evans SL
    Injury; 2009 Nov; 40(11):1161-6. PubMed ID: 19524905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of divergent screw placement on the initial strength of plate-to-bone fixation.
    Robert KQ; Chandler R; Baratta RV; Thomas KA; Harris MB
    J Trauma; 2003 Dec; 55(6):1139-44. PubMed ID: 14676661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
    Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?
    Ramaswamy R; Evans S; Kosashvili Y
    Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19747678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical screw pullout strength and effective shear stress in synthetic third generation composite femurs.
    Zdero R; Rose S; Schemitsch EH; Papini M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 17408335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can DCP and LCP plates generate more compression? The effect of multiple eccentrically placed screws and their drill positioning guides.
    Ya'ish FM; Nanu AM; Cross AT
    Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1095-100. PubMed ID: 21450288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pullout strength variance among self-tapping screws inserted to different depths.
    Schoenfeld A; Vrabec G; Battula S; Salvator A; Njus G
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Sep; 37(9):466-9. PubMed ID: 18982183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical comparison of two patterns of screw insertion.
    Lichtblau S; Gallina J; Nasser P; Munyoki M; Jepsen K
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 19093901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A static mechanical comparison between two transarticular internal fixation techniques in the lower cervical spine].
    Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Yin JW; Jiang WY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 87(23):1599-602. PubMed ID: 17803847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
    Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of screw pullout rate on screw purchase in synthetic cancellous bone.
    Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):024501. PubMed ID: 19102576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques.
    Blair B; Koval KJ; Kummer F; Zuckerman JD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):256-63. PubMed ID: 8070205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Harms technique of C1-C2 fixation with polyaxial screws and rods].
    Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Sebesta P; Kryl J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15860148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Axial cyclic behavior of the bone-screw interface.
    Inceoğlu S; Ehlert M; Akbay A; McLain RF
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Nov; 28(9):888-93. PubMed ID: 16458568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pullout resistance of thoracic extrapedicular screws used as a salvage procedure.
    Yüksel KZ; Adams MS; Chamberlain RH; Potocnjak M; Park SC; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 17482111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
    Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping.
    Chen LH; Tai CL; Lai PL; Lee DM; Tsai TT; Fu TS; Niu CC; Chen WJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Oct; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 19481845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.