183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19525463)
1. Qualification of PET scanners for use in multicenter cancer clinical trials: the American College of Radiology Imaging Network experience.
Scheuermann JS; Saffer JR; Karp JS; Levering AM; Siegel BA
J Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 50(7):1187-93. PubMed ID: 19525463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Qualification of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging in Clinical Trials.
Scheuermann JS; Reddin JS; Opanowski A; Kinahan PE; Siegel BA; Shankar LK; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1065-1071. PubMed ID: 28254874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-centre calibration of an adaptive thresholding method for PET-based delineation of tumour volumes in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer.
Schaefer A; Nestle U; Kremp S; Hellwig D; Grgic A; Buchholz HG; Mischke W; Gromoll C; Dennert P; Plotkin M; Senftleben S; Thorwarth D; Tosch M; Wahl A; Wengenmair H; Rübe C; Kirsch CM
Nuklearmedizin; 2012; 51(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 22446512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of PET quantification accuracy in vivo. Comparison of measured FDG concentration in the bladder with urine samples.
Maus J; Hofheinz F; Schramm G; Oehme L; Beuthien-Baumann B; Lukas M; Buchert R; Steinbach J; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(3):67-77. PubMed ID: 24553628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-Retest Reproducibility of
Kurland BF; Peterson LM; Shields AT; Lee JH; Byrd DW; Novakova-Jiresova A; Muzi M; Specht JM; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2019 May; 60(5):608-614. PubMed ID: 30361381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harmonization based on quantitative analysis of standardized uptake value variations across PET/CT scanners: a multicenter phantom study.
Monsef A; Ay MR; Sheikhzadeh P; Geramifar P; Rahmim A; Ghafarian P
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Sep; 43(9):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 35836388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a Qualification Phantom for PET Brain Imaging in a Multicenter Consortium: A Collaboration Between the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium and the SNMMI Clinical Trials Network.
Fahey F; Christian P; Zukotynski K; Sexton-Stallone B; Kiss C; Clarke B; Onar-Thomas A; Poussaint TY
J Nucl Med; 2019 May; 60(5):677-682. PubMed ID: 30530829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated Quantitative Analysis of American College of Radiology PET Phantom Images.
DiFilippo FP; Patel M; Patel S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Sep; 47(3):249-254. PubMed ID: 31019038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-scanner Aβ-PET harmonization using barrel phantom spatial resolution matching.
Ruwanpathirana GP; Williams RC; Masters CL; Rowe CC; Johnston LA; Davey CE
Alzheimers Dement (Amst); 2024; 16(1):e12561. PubMed ID: 38476638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters.
Westerterp M; Pruim J; Oyen W; Hoekstra O; Paans A; Visser E; van Lanschot J; Sloof G; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):392-404. PubMed ID: 17033848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of the influence of location, internal temperature, idle time, and normalization on the sensitivity of a mobile PET/CT scanner.
Belakhlef S; Church C; Hays A; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2008 Sep; 36(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 18703620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of flexible body surface coil and patient table on PET quantification and image quality in integrated PET/MR.
Fürst S; Souvatzoglou M; Martinez-Möller A; Schwaiger M; Nekolla SG; Ziegler SI
Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(3):79-87. PubMed ID: 24658368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of a Digital PET Prototype in Patients with Oncologic Diseases: Initial Experience and Comparison with Analog PET.
Nguyen NC; Vercher-Conejero JL; Sattar A; Miller MA; Maniawski PJ; Jordan DW; Muzic RF; Su KH; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber PF
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1378-85. PubMed ID: 26159588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The (68)Ge phantom-based FDG-PET site qualification program for clinical trials adopted by FIL (Italian Foundation on Lymphoma).
Chauvie S; Bergesio F; Fioroni F; Brambilla M; Biggi A; Versari A; Guerra L; Storto G; Musto P; Luminari S; Cabras MG; Balzarotti M; Rigacci L; Martelli M; Vitolo U; Federico M; Gallamini A
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 27133138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variability of lesion detectability and standardized uptake value according to the acquisition procedure and reconstruction among five PET scanners.
Takahashi Y; Oriuchi N; Otake H; Endo K; Murase K
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 22(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 18670864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of different standardized uptake value measures on PET-based quantification of treatment response.
Vanderhoek M; Perlman SB; Jeraj R
J Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 54(8):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23776199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Test-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in
Hofheinz F; Apostolova I; Oehme L; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1770-1775. PubMed ID: 28473598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) information conversion procedure for SUV calculation of PET scanners with different DICOM header information.
Shin HB; Sheen H; Lee HY; Kang J; Yoon DK; Suh TS
Phys Med; 2017 Dec; 44():243-248. PubMed ID: 28551298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
