315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19525533)
21. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
Lu CH; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
Okubo M; Laeng B; Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20441992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
Snow JC; Mattingley JB
Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
Burnham BR; Neely JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Direct versus indirect processing changes the influence of color in natural scene categorization.
Otsuka S; Kawaguchi J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1588-97. PubMed ID: 19801618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
Santangelo V; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Combined effects of perceptual grouping cues on object representation: evidence from motion-induced blindness.
Shibata M; Kawachi Y; Gyoba J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):387-97. PubMed ID: 20139454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
Wühr P; Kunde W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Parallel, independent attentional control settings for colors and shapes.
Adamo M; Wozny S; Pratt J; Ferber S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1730-5. PubMed ID: 20952772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.
Chen Z
Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors.
Schmidt F; Schmidt T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1480-94. PubMed ID: 20675795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A dissociation between attention and selection.
Remington RW; Folk CL
Psychol Sci; 2001 Nov; 12(6):511-5. PubMed ID: 11760140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task.
Wilimzig C; Tsuchiya N; Fahle M; Einhäuser W; Koch C
J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):7.1-10. PubMed ID: 18842078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.
Reed CL; Grubb JD; Steele C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
