These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19525534)

  • 41. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Salience representation in the parietal and frontal cortex.
    Zenon A; Filali N; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):918-30. PubMed ID: 19366288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Novelty and saliency in attentional capture by unannounced motion singletons.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 21208608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1039-60. PubMed ID: 16262497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Feature processing during visual search in normal aging: electrophysiological evidence.
    Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E; Cadaveira F
    Neurobiol Aging; 2008 Jul; 29(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 17346855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.
    Turatto M; Galfano G
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):286-97. PubMed ID: 11281103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
    Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Breaking through the attentional window: capture by abrupt onsets versus color singletons.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Lien MC; Jung K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1461-74. PubMed ID: 22806409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience.
    Geng JJ; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1584-601. PubMed ID: 18752405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Stimulus-salience and the time-course of saccade trajectory deviations.
    van Zoest W; Donk M; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):16. PubMed ID: 22923727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.
    Lamy D; Leber A; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1019-31. PubMed ID: 15584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A switch in task affects priming of pop-out: evidence for the role of episodes.
    Thomson DR; Milliken B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):318-33. PubMed ID: 21264719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. When motor attention improves selective attention: the dissociating role of saliency.
    Symes E; Ottoboni G; Tucker M; Ellis R; Tessari A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1387-97. PubMed ID: 19921595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.
    Bacon WF; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):485-96. PubMed ID: 8008550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Top-Down Prioritization of Salient Items May Produce the So-Called Stimulus-Driven Capture.
    Benoni H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():218. PubMed ID: 29599731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.