These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Encoding and memory for visible speech and gestures: a comparison between young and older adults. Thompson LA Psychol Aging; 1995 Jun; 10(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 7662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Galantucci B; Fowler CA; Turvey MT Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Jun; 13(3):361-77. PubMed ID: 17048719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audio-visual matching of speech and non-speech oral gestures in patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Schmid G; Ziegler W Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):546-55. PubMed ID: 16129459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Fowler CA; Dekle DJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):816-28. PubMed ID: 1834793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for effects of phonological correspondence between visible speech and written syllables. Kerzel D Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 12192448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech. Gordon PC; Meyer DE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):153-78. PubMed ID: 6232338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables. Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The motor theory of speech perception revisited. Massaro DW; Chen TH Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):453-7; discussion 458-62. PubMed ID: 18488668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motor activation from visible speech: evidence from stimulus response compatibility. Kerzel D; Bekkering H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):634-47. PubMed ID: 10811167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the causes of compensation for coarticulation: evidence for phonological mediation. Mitterer H Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1227-40. PubMed ID: 17355045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceiving the causes of coarticulatory acoustic variation: consonant voicing and vowel pitch. Pardo JS; Fowler CA Percept Psychophys; 1997 Oct; 59(7):1141-52. PubMed ID: 9360485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in vowels: Beyond phonemic identity. Ghaffarvand Mokari P; Gafos A; Williams D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2751-2764. PubMed ID: 32236835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integration of facial and newly learned visual cues in speech perception. Massaro D; Cohen MM; Meyer H; Stribling T; Sterling C; Vanderhyden S Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 21977695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beat gestures influence which speech sounds you hear. Bosker HR; Peeters D Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jan; 288(1943):20202419. PubMed ID: 33499783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-linguistic comparisons in the integration of visual and auditory speech. Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Smeele PM Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 7885260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of prosody and position on the timing of deictic gestures. Rusiewicz HL; Shaiman S; Iverson JM; Szuminsky N J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):458-70. PubMed ID: 23690565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. La langue et les Lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception. Werker JF; Frost PE; McGurk H Can J Psychol; 1992 Dec; 46(4):551-68. PubMed ID: 1286433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]