These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1952716)

  • 1. A comparison of speech results after the pharyngeal flap and the dynamic sphincteroplasty procedures.
    Pensler JM; Reich DS
    Ann Plast Surg; 1991 May; 26(5):441-3. PubMed ID: 1952716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The double-opposing buccal flap procedure for palatal lengthening.
    Mann RJ; Neaman KC; Armstrong SD; Ebner B; Bajnrauh R; Naum S
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jun; 127(6):2413-2418. PubMed ID: 21617473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pharyngeal flap and sphincterplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency have equal outcome at 1 year postoperatively: results of a randomized trial.
    Abyholm F; D'Antonio L; Davidson Ward SL; Kjøll L; Saeed M; Shaw W; Sloan G; Whitby D; Worhington H; Wyatt R;
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Sep; 42(5):501-11. PubMed ID: 16149831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenoid hypertrophy causing obstructive sleep apnea in children after pharyngeal flap surgery.
    Abdel-Aziz M; El-Fouly M; Elmagd EAA; Nassar A; Abdel-Wahid A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 276(12):3413-3417. PubMed ID: 31520163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the pharyngeal flap in the treatment of congenital velopharyngeal incompetence.
    Stueber K; Wilhelmsen HR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1984 Feb; 73(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 6695020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech benefits of posterior pharyngeal flap are preserved after surgical flap division for obstructive sleep apnea: experience with division of 12 flaps.
    Agarwal T; Sloan GM; Zajac D; Uhrich KS; Meadows W; Lewchalermwong JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Sep; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 14501320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision rates and speech outcomes following pharyngeal flap surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Setabutr D; Roth CT; Nolen DD; Cervenka B; Sykes JM; Senders CW; Tollefson TT
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 25835283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving Care of Cleft-Related Velopharyngeal Incompetence on Humanitarian Missions Using a Multidisciplinary Team Approach.
    Gunther S; Valerio I; Harshbarger R; Kumar AR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):e175-e178. PubMed ID: 30730509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency patients: a new technique for flap inset.
    Emara TA; Quriba AS
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Feb; 122(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 22252686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modified palatopharyngeous flap operation and its application in the correction of velopharyngeal incompetence.
    Ren YF; Wang GH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Apr; 91(4):612-7. PubMed ID: 8446714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal incompetence in patients with myotonic dystrophy.
    Amir A; Wolf Y; Ezra Y; Shohat M; Sher C; Hauben DJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 May; 42(5):549-52. PubMed ID: 10340866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety of nasal stenting in pharyngeal flap surgery for pediatric velopharyngeal dysfunction.
    Araslanova R; Instrum R; Dzioba A; Husein M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 130():109804. PubMed ID: 31794903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Levator repositioning and palatal lengthening for submucous clefts.
    Pensler JM; Bauer BS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1988 Nov; 82(5):765-9. PubMed ID: 3273885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical management of velopharyngeal dysfunction: outcome analysis of autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation.
    Witt PD; O'Daniel TG; Marsh JL; Grames LM; Muntz HR; Pilgram TK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(5):1287-96; discussion 1297-300. PubMed ID: 9105355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three different surgical techniques for designing pharyngeal flaps according to findings of videonasopharyngoscopy and multiplanar videofluoroscopy.
    Ysunza PA; Chaiyasate K; Rontal M; Shaheen K; Bartholomew B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 120():123-129. PubMed ID: 30776570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Superiorly based pharyngeal flap for treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
    Filip C; Matzen M; Aukner R; Moe M; Høgevold HE; Åbyholm F; Abrahamsen TG; Tønseth K
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):501-4. PubMed ID: 23524725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Submucous cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency: comparison of speech outcomes using three operative techniques by one surgeon.
    Sullivan SR; Vasudavan S; Marrinan EM; Mulliken JB
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Sep; 48(5):561-70. PubMed ID: 20815725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech outcome after cranial-based pharyngeal flap in children born with total cleft, cleft palate, or primary velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    de Buys Roessingh AS; Cherpillod J; Trichet-Zbinden C; Hohlfeld J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 64(12):1736-42. PubMed ID: 17113439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency--a 10 year experience].
    Amir A; Silfen R; Hauben DJ
    Harefuah; 1999 Nov; 137(9):357-61, 432. PubMed ID: 11419033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of outcomes of velopharyngeal surgery between the inferiorly and superiorly based pharyngeal flaps.
    Wattanawong K; Tan YC; Lo LJ; Chen PK; Chen YR
    Chang Gung Med J; 2007; 30(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 18062174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.