These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19527902)

  • 1. Expanding access to intrauterine contraception.
    Allen RH; Goldberg AB; Grimes DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):456.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19527902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IUDs and adolescents--an under-utilized opportunity for pregnancy prevention.
    Yen S; Saah T; Hillard PJ
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 23(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 19896396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current issues in emergency contraception: an overview for providers.
    Brunton J; Beal MW
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(6):457-63. PubMed ID: 17081936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contraception access and use among U.S. servicewomen during deployment.
    Grindlay K; Grossman D
    Contraception; 2013 Feb; 87(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23121821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion.
    Goodman S; Hendlish SK; Reeves MF; Foster-Rosales A
    Contraception; 2008 Aug; 78(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 18672116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.
    Harper CC; Blum M; de Bocanegra HT; Darney PD; Speidel JJ; Policar M; Drey EA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1359-69. PubMed ID: 18515520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevention of unintended pregnancy: a focus on long-acting reversible contraception.
    Pickle S; Wu J; Burbank-Schmitt E
    Prim Care; 2014 Jun; 41(2):239-60. PubMed ID: 24830607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of intrauterine contraception provision among US family physicians: a national survey of knowledge, attitudes and practice.
    Rubin SE; Fletcher J; Stein T; Segall-Gutierrez P; Gold M
    Contraception; 2011 May; 83(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 21477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The intrauterine device: rethinking old paradigms.
    Morgan KW
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17081937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical barriers to effective contraception.
    Leeman L
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2007 Mar; 34(1):19-29, vii. PubMed ID: 17472862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postabortion and Postpartum Intrauterine Device Provision for Adolescents and Young Adults.
    Peterson SF; Goldthwaite LM
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 32(5S):S30-S35. PubMed ID: 31585616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practices and perceptions on intrauterine contraception among Latvian obstetrician-gynecologists.
    Viberga I; Odlind V; Zodzika J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):583-8. PubMed ID: 16752238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion.
    Stanek AM; Bednarek PH; Nichols MD; Jensen JT; Edelman AB
    Contraception; 2009 Mar; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 19185676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: an opportunity to provide the optimal emergency contraception method and transition to highly effective contraception.
    Dermish AI; Turok DK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2013 Jul; 10(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 23895075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indications for removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices in Jos, north-central Nigeria.
    Mutihir JT; Ujah IA; Uduagbamen PF; Iranloye T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 9(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 17319339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.
    Ogburn JA; Espey E; Stonehocker J
    Contraception; 2005 Dec; 72(6):426-9. PubMed ID: 16307964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescents.
    Eisenberg D; McNicholas C; Peipert JF
    J Adolesc Health; 2013 Apr; 52(4 Suppl):S59-63. PubMed ID: 23535059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception.
    d'Arcangues C
    Contraception; 2007 Jun; 75(6 Suppl):S2-7. PubMed ID: 17531612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Renewed interest in intrauterine contraception in the United States: evidence and explanation.
    Hubacher D; Finer LB; Espey E
    Contraception; 2011 Apr; 83(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 21397085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.