231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19528320)
1. Role of DNA damage-induced replication checkpoint in promoting lesion bypass by translesion synthesis in yeast.
Pagès V; Santa Maria SR; Prakash L; Prakash S
Genes Dev; 2009 Jun; 23(12):1438-49. PubMed ID: 19528320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Requirement of replication checkpoint protein kinases Mec1/Rad53 for postreplication repair in yeast.
Gangavarapu V; Santa Maria SR; Prakash S; Prakash L
mBio; 2011; 2(3):e00079-11. PubMed ID: 21586645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Yeast Rev1 is cell cycle regulated, phosphorylated in response to DNA damage and its binding to chromosomes is dependent upon MEC1.
Sabbioneda S; Bortolomai I; Giannattasio M; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 17035102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colocalization of Mec1 and Mrc1 is sufficient for Rad53 phosphorylation in vivo.
Berens TJ; Toczyski DP
Mol Biol Cell; 2012 Mar; 23(6):1058-67. PubMed ID: 22298423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with polzeta and is partially required for spontaneous polzeta-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Sabbioneda S; Minesinger BK; Giannattasio M; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M; Jinks-Robertson S
J Biol Chem; 2005 Nov; 280(46):38657-65. PubMed ID: 16169844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA decay and limited Rad53 activation after liquid holding of UV-treated nucleotide excision repair deficient S. cerevisiae cells.
Giannattasio M; Lazzaro F; Siede W; Nunes E; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M
DNA Repair (Amst); 2004 Dec; 3(12):1591-9. PubMed ID: 15474420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ATR homolog Mec1 controls association of DNA polymerase zeta-Rev1 complex with regions near a double-strand break.
Hirano Y; Sugimoto K
Curr Biol; 2006 Mar; 16(6):586-90. PubMed ID: 16546083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physical and functional interactions between nucleotide excision repair and DNA damage checkpoint.
Giannattasio M; Lazzaro F; Longhese MP; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M
EMBO J; 2004 Jan; 23(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 14726955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The unstructured C-terminal tail of yeast Dpb11 (human TopBP1) protein is dispensable for DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint but required for the G2/M checkpoint.
Navadgi-Patil VM; Kumar S; Burgers PM
J Biol Chem; 2011 Nov; 286(47):40999-1007. PubMed ID: 21956112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint.
Majka J; Niedziela-Majka A; Burgers PM
Mol Cell; 2006 Dec; 24(6):891-901. PubMed ID: 17189191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair.
Friedel AM; Pike BL; Gasser SM
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19230642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The mechanism of nucleotide excision repair-mediated UV-induced mutagenesis in nonproliferating cells.
Kozmin SG; Jinks-Robertson S
Genetics; 2013 Mar; 193(3):803-17. PubMed ID: 23307894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complex formation with Rev1 enhances the proficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase zeta for mismatch extension and for extension opposite from DNA lesions.
Acharya N; Johnson RE; Prakash S; Prakash L
Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Dec; 26(24):9555-63. PubMed ID: 17030609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint in budding yeast.
Neecke H; Lucchini G; Longhese MP
EMBO J; 1999 Aug; 18(16):4485-97. PubMed ID: 10449414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clamping the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase into action.
Majka J; Burgers PM
Cell Cycle; 2007 May; 6(10):1157-60. PubMed ID: 17495536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Yet another job for Dna2: Checkpoint activation.
Wanrooij PH; Burgers PM
DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Aug; 32():17-23. PubMed ID: 25956863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations.
Cobb JA; Schleker T; Rojas V; Bjergbaek L; Tercero JA; Gasser SM
Genes Dev; 2005 Dec; 19(24):3055-69. PubMed ID: 16357221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA repair: DNA polymerase zeta and Rev1 break in.
Kolas NK; Durocher D
Curr Biol; 2006 Apr; 16(8):R296-9. PubMed ID: 16631579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Szyjka SJ; Aparicio JG; Viggiani CJ; Knott S; Xu W; Tavaré S; Aparicio OM
Genes Dev; 2008 Jul; 22(14):1906-20. PubMed ID: 18628397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases.
De Piccoli G; Katou Y; Itoh T; Nakato R; Shirahige K; Labib K
Mol Cell; 2012 Mar; 45(5):696-704. PubMed ID: 22325992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
