These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19529949)

  • 1. Lack of radiographic loosening signs in a hip resurfacing that failed by stem fracture.
    Watters TS; Hallows RK; Campbell P; Covington DB; Vail TP; Bolognesi MP
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Jul; 130(7):835-9. PubMed ID: 19529949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional results of isolated femoral revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Gilbert RE; Cheung G; Carrothers AD; Meyer C; Richardson JB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jul; 92(7):1600-4. PubMed ID: 20595565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of outcome of total hip arthroplasty based on initial postoperative radiographic analysis. Matched, paired comparisons of failed versus successful femoral components.
    Tapadiya D; Walker RH; Schurman DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Jun; (186):5-15. PubMed ID: 6723160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of implant failure in the Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bell RS; Schatzker J; Fornasier VL; Goodman SB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1985 Oct; 67(8):1165-75. PubMed ID: 3902844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ball ST; Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):735-41. PubMed ID: 17403794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing.
    Lavigne M; Laffosse JM; Ganapathi M; Girard J; Vendittoli P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():93-8. PubMed ID: 21543697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
    Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cementless femoral neck prosthesis CUT--clinical and radiological results after 5 years].
    Steens W; Skripitz R; Schneeberger AG; Petzing I; Simon U; Goetze C
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 20714982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resurfacing arthroplasty. Femoral head viability.
    Bradley GW; Freeman MA; Revell PA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):137-41. PubMed ID: 3594982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Value of the plain roentgen image and arthrography in diagnosis of loosening of cemented hip endoprostheses].
    Greiner B; Braun M; Becker W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 9381764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early failure of the Durom prosthesis in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Chinese patients.
    Li J; He C; Li D; Zheng W; Liu D; Xu W
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1816-21. PubMed ID: 23831082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Tripolar" hip arthroplasty for failed hip resurfacing: nineteen years follow-up.
    Scheerlinck T; Casteleyn PP
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2001 Oct; 67(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 11725576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resurfacing arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the hip.
    Grecula MJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):231-42, x. PubMed ID: 15833461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
    Shimmin AJ; Walter WL; Esposito C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 20357319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femoral neck resorption following hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a radiological and biomechanical analysis.
    Joseph J; Mullen M; McAuley A; Pillai A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Dec; 130(12):1433-8. PubMed ID: 20213452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Lundberg A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1140-3. PubMed ID: 17905947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term results of the ABG-1 hydroxyapatite coated total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 111 cases with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
    Bidar R; Kouyoumdjian P; Munini E; Asencio G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 19926546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The viability of the femoral head after resurfacing hip arthroplasty in humans.
    Howie DW; Cornish BL; Vernon-Roberts B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jun; (291):171-84. PubMed ID: 8504596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia.
    Amstutz HC; Antoniades JT; Le Duff MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Feb; 89(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 17272449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.