1019 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19531092)
1. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone formation around immediately loaded and submerged dental implants with a modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface after 4 and 8 weeks: a human histologic and histomorphometric analysis.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Shibli JA; Perrotti V; Iezzi G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 19865630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs.
Schliephake H; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gédet P; Staedt H
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Sep; 37(9):818-28. PubMed ID: 20573183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep.
Langhoff JD; Voelter K; Scharnweber D; Schnabelrauch M; Schlottig F; Hefti T; Kalchofner K; Nuss K; von Rechenberg B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18977118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of osseointegration of dental implants coated with collagen, chondroitin sulphate and BMP-4: an animal study.
Stadlinger B; Pilling E; Huhle M; Mai R; Bierbaum S; Scharnweber D; Kuhlisch E; Loukota R; Eckelt U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 37(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 17983729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of osseointegration of titanium implants with acid-etched surfaces and different biomolecular coatings.
Mueller CK; Thorwarth M; Schmidt M; Schlegel KA; Schultze-Mosgau S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):726-36. PubMed ID: 21441047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface.
Barewal RM; Oates TW; Meredith N; Cochran DL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):641-51. PubMed ID: 14579951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface-conditioned dental implants: an animal study on bone formation.
Stadlinger B; Lode AT; Eckelt U; Range U; Schlottig F; Hefti T; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 36(10):882-91. PubMed ID: 19735467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of modifications of dual acid-etched implant surfaces on periimplant bone formation. Part II: calcium phosphate coatings.
Schliephake H; Aref A; Scharnweber D; Rösler S; Sewing A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19126106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs.
Schwarz F; Herten M; Sager M; Wieland M; Dard M; Becker J
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 34(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17137467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of immobilized bone morphogenic protein 2 coating of titanium implants on peri-implant bone formation.
Schliephake H; Aref A; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Roessler S; Sewing A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 16164462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
