These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19531808)

  • 1. How safe is control banding? Integrated evaluation by comparing OELs with measurement data and using monte carlo simulation.
    Tischer M; Bredendiek-Kämper S; Poppek U; Packroff R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jul; 53(5):449-62. PubMed ID: 19531808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
    Schneider K; Schuhmacher-Wolz U; Hassauer M; Darschnik S; Elmshäuser E; Mosbach-Schulz O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulation to reconstruct formaldehyde exposure levels from summary parameters reported in the literature.
    Lavoué J; Bégin D; Beaudry C; Gérin M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Mar; 51(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 17046960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. History and evolution of control banding: a review.
    Zalk DM; Nelson DI
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 May; 5(5):330-46. PubMed ID: 18350442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Recent prevention strategies and occupational risk analysis: Control Banding and Sobane].
    Ghittori S; Ferrari M; Negri S; Serranti P; Sacco P; Biffi R; Imbriani M
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2006; 28(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 16705887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm.
    Tielemans E; Noy D; Schinkel J; Heussen H; Van Der Schaaf D; West J; Fransman W
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):443-54. PubMed ID: 18621742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model.
    Marquart H; Heussen H; Le Feber M; Noy D; Tielemans E; Schinkel J; West J; Van Der Schaaf D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):429-41. PubMed ID: 18587140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis of a diffusion model for the assessment of halogen gas exposure during dosing of brominators.
    Shade WD; Jayjock MA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 9183836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Strength and Validity of Hazard Banding.
    Scheffers T; Doornaert B; Berne N; van Breukelen G; Leplay A; van Miert E
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Nov; 60(9):1049-1061. PubMed ID: 27621219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapor degreasing and bag filling operations.
    Jones RM; Nicas M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16172141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of COSHH essentials: methylene chloride, isopropanol, and acetone exposures in a small printing plant.
    Lee EG; Harper M; Bowen RB; Slaven J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jul; 53(5):463-74. PubMed ID: 19435980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a GIS-based indicator for environmental pesticide exposure and its application to a Belgian case-control study on bladder cancer.
    Cornelis C; Schoeters G; Kellen E; Buntinx F; Zeegers M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2009 Mar; 212(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 18768353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Default values for assessment of potential dermal exposure of the hands to industrial chemicals in the scope of regulatory risk assessments.
    Marquart H; Warren ND; Laitinen J; van Hemmen JJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jul; 50(5):469-89. PubMed ID: 16540540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling aggregate exposures to glycol ethers from use of commercial floor products.
    Koontz M; Price P; Hamilton J; Daggett D; Sielken R; Bretzlaff R; Tyler T
    Int J Toxicol; 2006; 25(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 16597548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing workplace cytotoxic surface contamination using a closed-system drug transfer device.
    Siderov J; Kirsa S; McLauchlan R
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2010 Mar; 16(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19965949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development and use of respirator response functions as part of a workplace exposure monitoring program for control of potential respiratory hazards.
    Maxim LD; Allshouse JN; Chen SH; Treadway J; Venturin D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Apr; 27(2):131-49. PubMed ID: 9671568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns of dermal exposure to hazardous substances in European union workplaces.
    Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah R; Roff M; Delgado P; Eriksson K; Fransman W; Gijsbers JH; Hughson G; Mäkinen M; van Hemmen JJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Apr; 48(3):285-97. PubMed ID: 15059805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do EASE scenarios fit workplace reality? A validation study of the EASE model. Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure.
    Bredendiek-Kämper S
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Feb; 16(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 11217709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.
    Romano D; Bernetti A; De Lauretis R
    Environ Int; 2004 Oct; 30(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15337355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.