These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19532516)

  • 1. Novel polarization-sensitive micropulse lidar measurement technique.
    Flynn CJ; Mendoza A; Zheng Y; Mathur S
    Opt Express; 2007 Mar; 15(6):2785-90. PubMed ID: 19532516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polar decomposition of 3 x 3 Mueller matrix: a tool for quantitative tissue polarimetry.
    Swami MK; Manhas S; Buddhiwant P; Ghosh N; Uppal A; Gupta PK
    Opt Express; 2006 Oct; 14(20):9324-37. PubMed ID: 19529316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reexamination of depolarization in lidar measurements.
    Gimmestad GG
    Appl Opt; 2008 Jul; 47(21):3795-802. PubMed ID: 18641748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the relationships between lidar integrated backscattered light and accumulated depolarization ratios for linear and circular polarization for water droplets, fog oil, and dust.
    Cao X; Roy G; Roy N; Bernier R
    Appl Opt; 2009 Jul; 48(21):4130-41. PubMed ID: 19623227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Four-component polarization measurement of lidar atmospheric scattering.
    Houston JD; Carswell AI
    Appl Opt; 1978 Feb; 17(4):614-20. PubMed ID: 20197836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Depolarization ratio measurement using single photomultiplier tube in micropulse lidar.
    Dubey PK; Jain SL; Arya BC; Kulkarni PS
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 May; 80(5):053111. PubMed ID: 19485496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-line type micropulse lidar with an annular beam: experiment.
    Shiina T; Yoshida K; Ito M; Okamura Y
    Appl Opt; 2005 Dec; 44(34):7407-13. PubMed ID: 16353813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Water Cloud Detection with Circular Polarization Lidar: A Semianalytic Monte Carlo Simulation Approach.
    Ahmad W; Zhang K; Tong Y; Xiao D; Wu L; Liu D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-signal method for accurate measurements of depolarization ratio with lidar.
    Reichardt J; Baumgart R; McGee TJ
    Appl Opt; 2003 Aug; 42(24):4909-13. PubMed ID: 12952338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polarimetric LiDAR backscattering contrast of linearly and circularly polarized pulses for ideal depolarizing targets in generic water fogs.
    Tremblay G; Roy G
    Appl Opt; 2021 Feb; 60(5):1217-1231. PubMed ID: 33690553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. General description of polarization in lidar using Stokes vectors and polar decomposition of Mueller matrices.
    Hayman M; Thayer JP
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Apr; 29(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 22472814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural processing of linearly and circularly polarized light signal in a mantis shrimp
    Chiou TH; Wang CW
    J Exp Biol; 2020 Nov; 223(Pt 22):. PubMed ID: 33097570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mueller matrices and information derived from linear polarization lidar measurements: theory.
    Ben-David A
    Appl Opt; 1998 Apr; 37(12):2448-63. PubMed ID: 18273180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of an all-day portable polarization lidar system based on the division-of-focal-plane scheme for atmospheric polarization measurements.
    Kong Z; Ma T; Zheng K; Cheng Y; Gong Z; Hua D; Mei L
    Opt Express; 2021 Nov; 29(23):38512-38526. PubMed ID: 34808903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Depolarization ratio and attenuated backscatter for nine cloud types: analyses based on collocated CALIPSO lidar and MODIS measurements.
    Cho HM; Yang P; Kattawar GW; Nasiri SL; Hu Y; Minnis P; Trepte C; Winker D
    Opt Express; 2008 Mar; 16(6):3931-48. PubMed ID: 18542490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulated polarization diversity lidar returns from water and precipitating mixed phase clouds.
    Sassen K; Zhao H; Dodd GC
    Appl Opt; 1992 May; 31(15):2914-23. PubMed ID: 20725225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mueller-matrix ellipsometry using the division-of-amplitude photopolarimeter: a study of depolarization effects.
    Krishnan S; Nordine PC
    Appl Opt; 1994 Jul; 33(19):4184-92. PubMed ID: 20935772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial distribution of doubly scattered polarized laser radiation in the focal plane of a lidar receiver.
    Griaznov V; Veselovskii I; Di Girolamo P; Korenskii M; Summa D
    Appl Opt; 2007 Sep; 46(27):6821-30. PubMed ID: 17882305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polarization properties of receiving telescopes in atmospheric remote sensing polarization lidars.
    Luo J; Liu D; Huang Z; Wang B; Bai J; Cheng Z; Zhang Y; Tang P; Yang L; Su L
    Appl Opt; 2017 Aug; 56(24):6837-6845. PubMed ID: 29048022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of an atmospheric polarization Scheimpflug lidar system based on a time-division multiplexing scheme.
    Mei L; Guan P
    Opt Lett; 2017 Sep; 42(18):3562-3565. PubMed ID: 28914902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.