These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19534142)

  • 1. An image-based method for obtaining pore-size distribution of porous media.
    Yang Z; Peng XF; Lee DJ; Chen MY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 May; 43(9):3248-53. PubMed ID: 19534142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of porous media by T
    Yu Z; Zhang Y; Xiao L; Liao G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 56():19-23. PubMed ID: 30343123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pore size distribution in tablets measured with a morphological sieve.
    Wu YS; van Vliet LJ; Frijlink HW; van der Voort Maarschalk K
    Int J Pharm; 2007 Sep; 342(1-2):176-83. PubMed ID: 17580106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional diffusion of non-sorbing species in porous sandstone: computer simulation based on X-ray microtomography using synchrotron radiation.
    Nakashima Y; Nakano T; Nakamura K; Uesugi K; Tsuchiyama A; Ikeda S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):253-64. PubMed ID: 15358495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence on permeability of the structural parameters of heterogeneous porous media.
    Le Coq L
    Environ Technol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 18613613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local thickness and anisotropy approaches to characterize pore size distribution of three-dimensional porous networks.
    Chiang MY; Landis FA; Wang X; Smith JR; Cicerone MT; Dunkers J; Luo Y
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2009 Mar; 15(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 19061384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A facile method to determine pore size distribution in porous scaffold by using image processing.
    Lo Re G; Lopresti F; Petrucci G; Scaffaro R
    Micron; 2015 Sep; 76():37-45. PubMed ID: 26026425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of several biochars with 3D imaging.
    Hyväluoma J; Kulju S; Hannula M; Wikberg H; Källi A; Rasa K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(26):25648-25658. PubMed ID: 28342082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative stereological analysis of the highly porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds using X-ray CM and SEM.
    Zygmuntowicz J; Zima A; Czechowska J; Szlazak K; Ślosarczyk A; Konopka K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2017; 28(3):235-246. PubMed ID: 28527187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative NMR imaging of multiphase flow in porous media.
    Chen S; Kim KH; Qin F; Watson AT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 10(5):815-26. PubMed ID: 1461077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Use of mercury porosimetry, assisted by nitrogen adsorption in the investigation of the pore structure of tablets].
    Szepes A; Kovács J; Szabóné Revész P
    Acta Pharm Hung; 2006; 76(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 17094658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictions of dynamic changes in reaction rates as a consequence of incomplete mixing using pore scale reactive transport modeling on images of porous media.
    Alhashmi Z; Blunt MJ; Bijeljic B
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Aug; 179():171-81. PubMed ID: 26142546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using a single thin section.
    Tahmasebi P; Sahimi M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Jun; 85(6 Pt 2):066709. PubMed ID: 23005245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of pore size distribution in reservoir rocks using MRI logging: A case study of South Pars Gas Field.
    Esmaili M; Shadizadeh SR; Habibnia B; Ghojogh JN; Noruzi-Masir B; Bakhshi P
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2017 Dec; 130():172-187. PubMed ID: 28968589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nondestructive technique for the characterization of the pore size distribution of soft porous constructs for tissue engineering.
    Safinia L; Mantalaris A; Bismarck A
    Langmuir; 2006 Mar; 22(7):3235-42. PubMed ID: 16548583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reactive transport in porous media: pore-network model approach compared to pore-scale model.
    Varloteaux C; Vu MT; Békri S; Adler PM
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Feb; 87(2):023010. PubMed ID: 23496613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular dynamics simulation studies of the conformation and lateral mobility of a charged adsorbate biomolecule: implications for estimating the critical value of the radius of a pore in porous media.
    Zhang X; Wang JC; Lacki KM; Liapis AI
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2005 Oct; 290(2):373-82. PubMed ID: 15925373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real time monitoring of biofilm development under flow conditions in porous media.
    Bozorg A; Gates ID; Sen A
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(9):937-51. PubMed ID: 22963147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved algorithm for estimating pore size distribution from pore space images of porous media.
    Song S; Ding Q; Wei J
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Nov; 100(5-1):053314. PubMed ID: 31869964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of methods for determining the pore size distribution and pore-network connectivity of porous carbons.
    Cai Q; Buts A; Biggs MJ; Seaton NA
    Langmuir; 2007 Jul; 23(16):8430-40. PubMed ID: 17602506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.