These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19534855)
1. Performance of different types of hearing protectors undergoing high-level impulse noise. Buck K Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 19534855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing protectors: topicality and research needs. Canetto P Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 19534847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hearing protectors "real-world" performance and the European directive 2003/10/EC. Canetto P; Voix J Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 19572468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Bockstael A; Keppler H; Dhooge I; D'haenens W; Maes L; Philips B; Vinck B Int J Audiol; 2008 Mar; 47(3):119-33. PubMed ID: 18307092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is it reasonable to expect individuals to wear hearing protectors for extended periods? Williams W Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 19534850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of weapon noise measurement and damage risk criteria: considerations for auditory protection and performance. Nakashima A; Farinaccio R Mil Med; 2015 Apr; 180(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 25826345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices]. Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. German criteria for selection of hearing protectors in the interest of good signal audibility. Liedtke M Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 19534849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hearing conservation in 2012: focus on NRR. Schulz TY Occup Health Saf; 2012 Mar; 81(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 22474900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive noise survey of the S-70A-9 Black Hawk helicopter. King RB; Saliba AJ; Brock JR Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Feb; 70(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 10206928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection of Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors for Use in An Indoor Shooting Range. Mlynski R; Kozlowski E Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(13):. PubMed ID: 31252535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations. Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing differences in methodologies for effective noise exposure calculation. Arezes PM; Geraldes J Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 19534851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise. Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of noise on speech recognition: Challenges for communication by service members. Le Prell CG; Clavier OH Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():76-89. PubMed ID: 27743882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]