These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19535538)

  • 21. A comprehensive evaluation of popular proteomics software workflows for label-free proteome quantification and imputation.
    Välikangas T; Suomi T; Elo LL
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Nov; 19(6):1344-1355. PubMed ID: 28575146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design and analysis of quantitative differential proteomics investigations using LC-MS technology.
    Bukhman YV; Dharsee M; Ewing R; Chu P; Topaloglou T; Le Bihan T; Goh T; Duewel H; Stewart II; Wisniewski JR; Ng NF
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2008 Feb; 6(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 18324749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peptide sequence confidence in accurate mass and time analysis and its use in complex proteomics experiments.
    May D; Liu Y; Law W; Fitzgibbon M; Wang H; Hanash S; McIntosh M
    J Proteome Res; 2008 Dec; 7(12):5148-56. PubMed ID: 19367719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring skyline for both MS(E) -based label-free proteomics and HRMS quantitation of small molecules.
    Liu S; Chen X; Yan Z; Qin S; Xu J; Lin J; Yang C; Shui W
    Proteomics; 2014 Feb; 14(2-3):169-80. PubMed ID: 24307133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robust Summarization and Inference in Proteome-wide Label-free Quantification.
    Sticker A; Goeminne L; Martens L; Clement L
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jul; 19(7):1209-1219. PubMed ID: 32321741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. EBprot: Statistical analysis of labeling-based quantitative proteomics data.
    Koh HW; Swa HL; Fermin D; Ler SG; Gunaratne J; Choi H
    Proteomics; 2015 Aug; 15(15):2580-91. PubMed ID: 25913743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. SuperHirn - a novel tool for high resolution LC-MS-based peptide/protein profiling.
    Mueller LN; Rinner O; Schmidt A; Letarte S; Bodenmiller B; Brusniak MY; Vitek O; Aebersold R; Müller M
    Proteomics; 2007 Oct; 7(19):3470-80. PubMed ID: 17726677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. OptiMissP: A dashboard to assess missingness in proteomic data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry.
    Arioli A; Dagliati A; Geary B; Peek N; Kalra PA; Whetton AD; Geifman N
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249771. PubMed ID: 33857200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A hybrid approach to protein differential expression in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
    Wang X; Anderson GA; Smith RD; Dabney AR
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):1586-91. PubMed ID: 22522136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MS-EmpiRe Utilizes Peptide-level Noise Distributions for Ultra-sensitive Detection of Differentially Expressed Proteins.
    Ammar C; Gruber M; Csaba G; Zimmer R
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2019 Sep; 18(9):1880-1892. PubMed ID: 31235637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics in Plant.
    Wang R; Zhou P; Pan Y; Zheng L; Dong X; Shen R; Lan P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2665():75-83. PubMed ID: 37166594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC-MS proteomics studies.
    Daly DS; Anderson KK; Panisko EA; Purvine SO; Fang R; Monroe ME; Baker SE
    J Proteome Res; 2008 Mar; 7(3):1209-17. PubMed ID: 18251496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trypsin catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers.
    Heller M; Mattou H; Menzel C; Yao X
    J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2003 Jul; 14(7):704-18. PubMed ID: 12837592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An overview of label-free quantitation methods in proteomics by mass spectrometry.
    Wong JW; Cagney G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():273-83. PubMed ID: 20013377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative evaluation of label-free SINQ normalized spectral index quantitation in the central proteomics facilities pipeline.
    Trudgian DC; Ridlova G; Fischer R; Mackeen MM; Ternette N; Acuto O; Kessler BM; Thomas B
    Proteomics; 2011 Jul; 11(14):2790-7. PubMed ID: 21656681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spectral Clustering Improves Label-Free Quantification of Low-Abundant Proteins.
    Griss J; Stanek F; Hudecz O; Dürnberger G; Perez-Riverol Y; Vizcaíno JA; Mechtler K
    J Proteome Res; 2019 Apr; 18(4):1477-1485. PubMed ID: 30859831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. DanteR: an extensible R-based tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data.
    Taverner T; Karpievitch YV; Polpitiya AD; Brown JN; Dabney AR; Anderson GA; Smith RD
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):2404-6. PubMed ID: 22815360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiple Imputation Approaches Applied to the Missing Value Problem in Bottom-Up Proteomics.
    Gardner ML; Freitas MA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Sep; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 34502557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. APP: an Automated Proteomics Pipeline for the analysis of mass spectrometry data based on multiple open access tools.
    Malm EK; Srivastava V; Sundqvist G; Bulone V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):441. PubMed ID: 25547515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Data Imputation in Merged Isobaric Labeling-Based Relative Quantification Datasets.
    Palstrøm NB; Matthiesen R; Beck HC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2051():297-308. PubMed ID: 31552635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.