369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19535563)
1. Competency to be resentenced and the Rockefeller Drug Law reform act: how does it affect the mentally Ill?
Ford E; Winkler B; Barber-Rioja V; Dell'anno C; Cohen S
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 19535563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Competency courts: a creative solution for restoring competency to the competency process.
Finkle MJ; Kurth R; Cadle C; Mullan J
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):767-86. PubMed ID: 19784943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Basics of civil and criminal law of psychiatric coercive measures in France].
Gravier B; Völlm B
Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Mar; 34(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 17390265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Public policy statement on persons with alcohol and other drug (AOD) problems and the criminal justice system. American Society of Addiction Medicine.
J Addict Dis; 1994; 13(4):234-7. PubMed ID: 7734472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Forfeiture of the proceeds of drug-related crimes: a Swedish point of view.
Riberdahl S; Vängby S
Bull Narc; 1984; 36(4):51-9. PubMed ID: 6570700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population impact of mass incarceration under New York's Rockefeller drug laws: an analysis of years of life lost.
Drucker E
J Urban Health; 2002 Sep; 79(3):434-5. PubMed ID: 12200514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Candor, zeal, and the substitution of judgement: ethics and the mentally ill criminal defendant.
King JD
Am Univ Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 58(2):207-66. PubMed ID: 20222213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
Cantor JD
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Competency, civil commitment, and the dangerousness of the mentally ill.
Bittman BJ; Convit A
J Forensic Sci; 1993 Nov; 38(6):1460-6. PubMed ID: 8263487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
Borger BA
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Substance misuse and substance-related disorders in forensic psychiatry.
Gendel MH
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):649-73. PubMed ID: 16904504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forcible medication of mentally ill criminal defendants: the case of Russell Eugene Weston, Jr.
Feinberg A
Stanford Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 54(4):769-91. PubMed ID: 11944661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Study of affecting factors of mentally prisoner's competency to serve a sentence].
Huang FY; Lu CR; Zhang QT; Cai W; Guan W; Wu J; Wang J
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004; 20(4):218-20. PubMed ID: 15751658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of competency to stand trial in mental health courts.
Stafford KP; Wygant DB
Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 15818634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners.
Moser DJ; Arndt S; Kanz JE; Benjamin ML; Bayless JD; Reese RL; Paulsen JS; Flaum MA
Compr Psychiatry; 2004; 45(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14671730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
