BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19535738)

  • 1. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change.
    Eyre-Walker A; Keightley PD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):2097-108. PubMed ID: 19535738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA close to protein-coding genes in wild house mice.
    Kousathanas A; Oliver F; Halligan DL; Keightley PD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1183-91. PubMed ID: 21059791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution when the evolutionary divergence between species is small.
    Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
    J Mol Evol; 2012 Feb; 74(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 22327123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
    Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The McDonald-Kreitman test and slightly deleterious mutations.
    Charlesworth J; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Jun; 25(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 18195052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila.
    Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1350-60. PubMed ID: 15044594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive Evolution Is Substantially Impeded by Hill-Robertson Interference in Drosophila.
    Castellano D; Coronado-Zamora M; Campos JL; Barbadilla A; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Feb; 33(2):442-55. PubMed ID: 26494843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contributions of protein-coding and regulatory change to adaptive molecular evolution in murid rodents.
    Halligan DL; Kousathanas A; Ness RW; Harr B; Eöry L; Keane TM; Adams DJ; Keightley PD
    PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(12):e1003995. PubMed ID: 24339797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overestimation of the adaptive substitution rate in fluctuating populations.
    Rousselle M; Mollion M; Nabholz B; Bataillon T; Galtier N
    Biol Lett; 2018 May; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 29743267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila.
    Andolfatto P
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7062):1149-52. PubMed ID: 16237443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inference of Distribution of Fitness Effects and Proportion of Adaptive Substitutions from Polymorphism Data.
    Tataru P; Mollion M; Glémin S; Bataillon T
    Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 28951530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species.
    Gossmann TI; Song BH; Windsor AJ; Mitchell-Olds T; Dixon CJ; Kapralov MV; Filatov DA; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1822-32. PubMed ID: 20299543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of small insertions and deletions in the coding genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Chong Z; Zhai W; Li C; Gao M; Gong Q; Ruan J; Li J; Jiang L; Lv X; Hungate E; Wu CI
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Dec; 30(12):2699-708. PubMed ID: 24077769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of Five Gene Sets in Chimpanzees Suggests Decoupling between the Action of Selection on Protein-Coding and on Noncoding Elements.
    Santpere G; Carnero-Montoro E; Petit N; Serra F; Hvilsom C; Rambla J; Heredia-Genestar JM; Halligan DL; Dopazo H; Navarro A; Bosch E
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 May; 7(6):1490-505. PubMed ID: 25977458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective population size and the efficacy of selection on the X chromosomes of two closely related Drosophila species.
    Andolfatto P; Wong KM; Bachtrog D
    Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():114-28. PubMed ID: 21173424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.
    Welch JJ
    Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):821-37. PubMed ID: 16582427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
    Andolfatto P
    Genome Res; 2007 Dec; 17(12):1755-62. PubMed ID: 17989248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multilocus analyses reveal little evidence for lineage-wide adaptive evolution within major clades of soft pines (Pinus subgenus Strobus).
    Eckert AJ; Bower AD; Jermstad KD; Wegrzyn JL; Knaus BJ; Syring JV; Neale DB
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Nov; 22(22):5635-50. PubMed ID: 24134614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mapping Selection within Drosophila melanogaster Embryo's Anatomy.
    Salvador-Martínez I; Coronado-Zamora M; Castellano D; Barbadilla A; Salazar-Ciudad I
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 29040697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changing Population Size in McDonald-Kreitman Style Analyses: Artifactual Correlations and Adaptive Evolution between Humans and Chimpanzees.
    Soni V; Moutinho AF; Eyre-Walker A
    Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 35143656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.