220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19536118)
1. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: the need to get retail genomics right.
Schickedanz AD; Herdman RC
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Jul; 86(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19536118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The genetic testing process: how much counseling is needed?
Cummings S
J Clin Oncol; 2000 Nov; 18(21 Suppl):60S-4S. PubMed ID: 11060329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic and genomic tests.
Oncology Nursing Society
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2010 Jul; 37(4):385. PubMed ID: 20591798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right roadmap for personalized tests.
Bourzac K
Cancer Discov; 2012 Jun; 2(6):478. PubMed ID: 22684442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic testing: when to test, when to refer.
Pagon RA
Am Fam Physician; 2005 Jul; 72(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 16035680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic testing: a struggle for oncologists.
Hede K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju172. PubMed ID: 24907388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of genetic and genomic services: context matters.
Dotson WD; Bowen MS; Kolor K; Khoury MJ
Genet Med; 2016 Jul; 18(7):672-4. PubMed ID: 26656648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States.
Hudson K; Javitt G; Burke W; Byers P;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1392-5. PubMed ID: 18055737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Most gene test sales are misleading.
Wallace H
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1221. PubMed ID: 18997755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulation: The FDA is overcautious on consumer genomics.
Green RC; Farahany NA
Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7483):286-7. PubMed ID: 24436984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: failure is not an option.
Altman RB
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Jul; 86(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 19536117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In need of counseling?
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jul; 26(7):716. PubMed ID: 18612273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome scans get personal with online consumer services.
Ann Neurol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):A15-7. PubMed ID: 18306396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Consumers warned that time is not yet ripe for nutrition profiling.
Check E
Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6963):107. PubMed ID: 14614463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The CDC's EGAPP initiative: evaluating the clinical evidence for genetic tests.
Berg AO
Am Fam Physician; 2009 Dec; 80(11):1218. PubMed ID: 19961131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Are doctors prepared for direct-to-consumer advertising of genetics tests?
Tracy EE
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1389-91. PubMed ID: 18055736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic screening and counseling: ethical considerations.
Sosnowski JR
J S C Med Assoc; 1995 Feb; 91(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 7707712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Putting DNA to the test.
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7265):697-8. PubMed ID: 19812626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pediatric clinical exome/genome sequencing and the engagement process: encouraging active conversation with the older child and adolescent: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
Bush LW; Bartoshesky LE; David KL; Wilfond B; Williams JL; Holm IA;
Genet Med; 2018 Jul; 20(7):692-694. PubMed ID: 29565417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and ambiguity in counseling patients about genetic risk.
Lloyd FJ; Reyna VF; Whalen P
Arch Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 161(20):2411-3. PubMed ID: 11700153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
