These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19537444)
1. Forensic databases: implications of the cases of S and Marper. Hepple B Med Sci Law; 2009 Apr; 49(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19537444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The UK National DNA Database: Implementation of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Amankwaa AO; McCartney C Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Mar; 284():117-128. PubMed ID: 29367171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Biology and justice]. Nadal JL J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 15005511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The advent of DNA databanks: implications for information privacy. de Gorgey A Am J Law Med; 1990; 16(3):381-98. PubMed ID: 2278244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical-legal problems of DNA databases in criminal investigation. Guillén M; Lareu MV; Pestoni C; Salas A; Carracedo A J Med Ethics; 2000 Aug; 26(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 10951922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minors or suspects? A discussion of the legal and ethical issues surrounding the indefinite storage of DNA collected from children aged 10-18 years on the National DNA Database in England and Wales. Mansel C; Davies S Med Sci Law; 2012 Oct; 52(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 22941519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector. Lakra R; Dimitriadis F Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Have the police hijacked our DNA? Lancet; 2003 Sep; 362(9388):927. PubMed ID: 14511920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Think-tank calls for an end to DNA deception. Adam D Nature; 2002 May; 417(6887):370. PubMed ID: 12024182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Universal forensic DNA databases: acceptable or illegal under the European Court of Human Rights regime? Tuazon OM J Law Biosci; 2021; 8(1):lsab022. PubMed ID: 34188945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment. Kimel CW Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Genetic expertise and the penal process]. Choclán Montalvo JA Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 1998; (9):59-90. PubMed ID: 10335335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forensic DNA data banking by state crime laboratories. McEwen JE Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jun; 56(6):1487-92. PubMed ID: 7762572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forensic databases: benefits and ethical and social costs. Levitt M Br Med Bull; 2007; 83():235-48. PubMed ID: 17906329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consent and prisoners. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Feb; 292(6516):324. PubMed ID: 3080154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets. Will JF Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A database of the innocent? Bingham R Splice Life; 2001; 7(2-3):8-9. PubMed ID: 12564461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of state legislation on DNA forensic data banking. McEwen JE; Reilly PR Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Jun; 54(6):941-58. PubMed ID: 8198138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population-based genetic studies: informed consent and confidentiality. Smith MJ Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 2001 Dec; 18(1):57-93. PubMed ID: 12741383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]