These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19537467)

  • 1. Ultrasonic sulcus penetration: a new approach for full crown preparations.
    Sous M; Lepetitcorps Y; Lasserre JF; Six N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Jun; 29(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 19537467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of ultrasonic instruments on the quality of preparation margins and bonding to dentin.
    Ellis R; Bennani V; Purton D; Chandler N; Lowe B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Aug; 24(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 22863135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative cutting effectiveness of an ultrasonic diamond tip and a high-speed diamond bur.
    Lima LM; Motisuki C; Corat EJ; Santos-Pinto L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19357615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Burs with guide pins for standardized tooth preparation.
    Boening KW; Kaestner KI; Luthardt RG; Walter MH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12066658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface roughness of restoration margin preparations: a comparative analysis of finishing techniques.
    Clarke I; Aquilia A; Bertassoni LE; Guazzato M; Klineberg I
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2015; 35(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 25738341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of apical cavity preparation with a new type of ultrasonic diamond tip.
    Bernardes RA; de Moraes IG; Garcia RB; Bernardineli N; Baldi JV; Victorino FR; Vasconcelos BC; Duarte MA; Bramante CM
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):484-7. PubMed ID: 17368345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cutting efficiency of orthograde ultrasonic tips by using a nonstatic model.
    Dentkos TR; Berzins DW
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):863-5. PubMed ID: 18570997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistency of labial finish line preparation for metal ceramic crowns: an investigation of a new bur.
    Seymour KG; Cherukara GP; Samarawickrama DY; Zou L
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 17971114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface roughness of tooth shoulder preparations created by rotary instrumentation, hand planing, and ultrasonic oscillation.
    Laufer BZ; Pilo R; Cardash HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jan; 75(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8850446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of cutting efficiency of ultrasonic tips used in orthograde endodontic treatment.
    Lin YH; Mickel AK; Jones JJ; Montagnese TA; González AF
    J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 16554212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The measurement of cutting forces in full crown preparation with three-dimensional transducer unit].
    Hao J; Wang Y; Lü PJ; Liu GY; Zhang YR
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 41(8):488-91. PubMed ID: 17074189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Newly-developed diamond points for conservative operative procedures.
    Katoh Y; Sunico M; Medina V; Shinkai K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 11210855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic margin preparation for fixed prosthodontics: a pilot study.
    Horne P; Bennani V; Chandler N; Purton D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Jun; 24(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 22691082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing cutting efficiencies of diamond burs using a high-speed electric handpiece.
    Chung EM; Sung EC; Wu B; Caputo AA
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16903197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of CVD diamond burs for ultraconservative cavity preparations: a report of two cases.
    Carvalho CA; Fagundes TC; Barata TJ; Trava-Airoldi VJ; Navarro MF
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):19-28; discussion 29. PubMed ID: 17244145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonic versus high-speed cavity preparation: analysis of increases in pulpal temperature and time to complete preparation.
    Vanderlei AD; Borges AL; Cavalcanti BN; Rode SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 100(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 18672127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.