BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19537543)

  • 1. Top-down effects on antagonistic inducible defense and offense.
    Kishida O; Trussell GC; Nishimura K
    Ecology; 2009 May; 90(5):1217-26. PubMed ID: 19537543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inducible offences affect predator-prey interactions and life-history plasticity in both predators and prey.
    Kishida O; Costa Z; Tezuka A; Michimae H
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jul; 83(4):899-906. PubMed ID: 24320092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predation risk suppresses the positive feedback between size structure and cannibalism.
    Kishida O; Trussell GC; Ohno A; Kuwano S; Ikawa T; Nishimura K
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Nov; 80(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 21668893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced recruitment of larger predators in the presence of large prey.
    Takatsu K; Kishida O
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jul; 89(7):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 32176809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gene expression profiles in Rana pirica tadpoles following exposure to a predation threat.
    Mori T; Yanagisawa Y; Kitani Y; Sugiyama M; Kishida O; Nishimura K
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):258. PubMed ID: 25886855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bulgy tadpoles: inducible defense morph.
    Kishida O; Nishimura K
    Oecologia; 2004 Aug; 140(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 15197643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contacts with large, active individuals intensify the predation risk of small conspecifics.
    Yamaguchi A; Takatsu K; Kishida O
    Ecology; 2016 Nov; 97(11):3206-3218. PubMed ID: 27870048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phenotypic Plasticity of Salamander Hatchlings in the Pre-Feeding Stage in Response to Future Prey.
    Katayama N; Okamura K; Tanimura K
    Zoolog Sci; 2021 Oct; 38(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 34664914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonadditive impacts of temperature and basal resource availability on predator-prey interactions and phenotypes.
    Costa ZJ; Kishida O
    Oecologia; 2015 Aug; 178(4):1215-25. PubMed ID: 25820751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible architecture of inducible morphological plasticity.
    Kishida O; Nishimura K
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 May; 75(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 16689953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predator and prey space use: dragonflies and tadpoles in an interactive game.
    Hammond JI; Luttbeg B; Sih A
    Ecology; 2007 Jun; 88(6):1525-35. PubMed ID: 17601144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcriptome analysis of predator- and prey-induced phenotypic plasticity in the Hokkaido salamander (Hynobius retardatus).
    Matsunami M; Kitano J; Kishida O; Michimae H; Miura T; Nishimura K
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jun; 24(12):3064-76. PubMed ID: 25943778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predator cannibalism can intensify negative impacts on heterospecific prey.
    Takatsu K; Kishida O
    Ecology; 2015 Jul; 96(7):1887-98. PubMed ID: 26378311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator-prey interaction between larval amphibians.
    Kishida O; Mizuta Y; Nishimura K
    Ecology; 2006 Jun; 87(6):1599-604. PubMed ID: 16869435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geographic variation in a predator-induced defense and its genetic basis.
    Kishida O; Trussell GC; Nishimura K
    Ecology; 2007 Aug; 88(8):1948-54. PubMed ID: 17824425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative importance of prey-borne and predator-borne chemical cues for inducible antipredator responses in tadpoles.
    Hettyey A; Tóth Z; Thonhauser KE; Frommen JG; Penn DJ; Van Buskirk J
    Oecologia; 2015 Nov; 179(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 26163350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different chemical cues originating from a shared predator induce common defense responses in two prey species.
    Takahara T; Doi H; Kohmatsu Y; Yamaoka R
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Jan; 16(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 23065237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in tadpoles: extension or innovation?
    Kraft PG; Franklin CE; Blows MW
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):450-8. PubMed ID: 16599921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prey subsidy or predator cue? Direct and indirect effects of caged predators on aquatic consumers and resources.
    Costa ZJ; Vonesh JR
    Oecologia; 2013 Dec; 173(4):1481-90. PubMed ID: 23771817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. You can't run but you can hide: refuge use in frog tadpoles elicits density-dependent predation by dragonfly larvae.
    Hossie TJ; Murray DL
    Oecologia; 2010 Jun; 163(2):395-404. PubMed ID: 20130916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.