333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19537722)
1. Elucidating molecular overlays from pairwise alignments using a genetic algorithm.
Jones G; Gao Y; Sage CR
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1847-55. PubMed ID: 19537722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GAPE: an improved genetic algorithm for pharmacophore elucidation.
Jones G
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2001-18. PubMed ID: 20977234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FLEXS: a method for fast flexible ligand superposition.
Lemmen C; Lengauer T; Klebe G
J Med Chem; 1998 Nov; 41(23):4502-20. PubMed ID: 9804690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting the accuracy of ligand overlay methods with Random Forest models.
Nandigam RK; Evans DA; Erickson JA; Kim S; Sutherland JJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2386-94. PubMed ID: 19053524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MARS: computing three-dimensional alignments for multiple ligands using pairwise similarities.
Klabunde T; Giegerich C; Evers A
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2022-30. PubMed ID: 22794356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting multiple ligand binding modes using self-consistent pharmacophore hypotheses.
Wallach I; Lilien R
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2116-28. PubMed ID: 19711952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combinatorial docking approach for structure prediction of large proteins and multi-molecular assemblies.
Inbar Y; Benyamini H; Nussinov R; Wolfson HJ
Phys Biol; 2005 Nov; 2(4):S156-65. PubMed ID: 16280621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.
Jones G; Willett P; Glen RC; Leach AR; Taylor R
J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(3):727-48. PubMed ID: 9126849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An extensive and diverse set of molecular overlays for the validation of pharmacophore programs.
Giangreco I; Cosgrove DA; Packer MJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):852-66. PubMed ID: 23565904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conformation mining: an algorithm for finding biologically relevant conformations.
Putta S; Landrum GA; Penzotti JE
J Med Chem; 2005 May; 48(9):3313-8. PubMed ID: 15857136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CAESAR: a new conformer generation algorithm based on recursive buildup and local rotational symmetry consideration.
Li J; Ehlers T; Sutter J; Varma-O'brien S; Kirchmair J
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1923-32. PubMed ID: 17691764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PharmID: pharmacophore identification using Gibbs sampling.
Feng J; Sanil A; Young SS
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1352-9. PubMed ID: 16711754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance.
Sato H; Shewchuk LM; Tang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2552-62. PubMed ID: 17125195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fully automated flexible docking of ligands into flexible synthetic receptors using forward and inverse docking strategies.
Kämper A; Apostolakis J; Rarey M; Marian CM; Lengauer T
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):903-11. PubMed ID: 16563022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols. (3). New methods and old problems in scoring function design.
Smith R; Hubbard RE; Gschwend DA; Leach AR; Good AC
J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Sep; 22(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 12798390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GAsDock: a new approach for rapid flexible docking based on an improved multi-population genetic algorithm.
Li H; Li C; Gui C; Luo X; Chen K; Shen J; Wang X; Jiang H
Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2004 Sep; 14(18):4671-6. PubMed ID: 15324886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
